I am reviewing some calculations for peak discharge using the rational method from a 4 acre area. A statement in the calculations is that due to the steep slope of the drainage area (8.8%), which is not explained, the time of concentration can be neglected. I cannot find any backing for this statement. The calculation goes on to use a value for the rainfall intensity of 6 inches/hour and references the 24 hr/25 year storm event (Madison County, NE). I do not know if this is connected to the first statement or not. We do see this all the time where the rainfall intensity in the rational equation is mistaken for the 24 hr/25 year storm event from the maps incldued in TR-55.
Any suggestions would be great.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
ENGINEERING.com surveyed 364 product development professionals to glean insights into how their teams are performing today, and what technologies are most useful to support their processes. Download Now
3D printing has quickly expanded beyond the realm of prototyping and into the world of end part manufacturing. Desktop 3D printers need not be used for making parts themselves, but as a secondary process for producing tools. Download Now
Creating tooling for injection molding is an expensive and complex proposition. Until recently, the only way to avoid tooling defects causing air traps, voids, shrinkage and the like was to employ a time-consuming and tedious physical prototyping process. Download Now