Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


NEi Nastran comparable to ANSYS?

NEi Nastran comparable to ANSYS?

NEi Nastran comparable to ANSYS?

I'm curious what people's thoughts are about whether NEi Nastran (with FEMAP) is comparable to ANSYS?

You can base it on whatever metrics you like, but some examples would be usability, ease of pre/post processing, solver speed, robustness, limitations, user community, technical support, continuous improvement of product, cost, meshing, etc.

I have received quotes for both, as well as other softwares, and NEi Nastran comes in at ~15k and ANSYS ~30K for full nonlinear structural capabilities, both with yearly maintenance of 20% purchase price.

My interest is mainly structural analysis but feel free to throw in your opinions other capabilities as well or if you  only have used one of the packages what do you dislike / like about it?

My background is I use Mechanica daily, am learning Abaqus, tinker with ANSYS when possible, and occasionally mess with Solidworks Simulation.

RE: NEi Nastran comparable to ANSYS?

Femap is awesome, esp. since version 10.0 and up.

Interactive mesh editing, tweaking, connecting - very cool really.

NEi are quite supportive.  I don't know how they compare to NX Nastran.

I do prefer Femap over Ansys for ease of use and pre-post.


RE: NEi Nastran comparable to ANSYS?

trainguy, thanks for your response. Do you have much experience using contacts in NEi Nastran? If so are you pleased with it's ability to handle complex contact setups?

I'm going to demo it but I also wanted other peoples opinions. Thanks.

RE: NEi Nastran comparable to ANSYS?

I have used both ANSYS and NEi Nastran with Femap and I agree completely with trainguy... Femap has come a long way and is very impressive. It is stable, handles very large models, fast, and has heaps of capabilities. The latest release has a very impressive beam cross-section results interpolator.  NEi Nastran is very capable as well. Both products are well maintained with a full release every 6-12 months and interim maintenance releases 2-5x a year. NEi Nastran has the same solvers built in as ANSYS like the PCGLSS but seems to support the faster ones in more solutions. I never had an issue with solver speed. Any limitations of Femap are handled in the NEi Nastran Editor and the limitations with NEi Nastran are mostly minor and they seem to be working on them so I would not be too concerned. ANSYS has plenty more limitations which are more of an issue for us like a lack of 3d composites. The NEi support team is responsive and handles both Femap and Nastran issues. ANSYS is a lot of marketing hype.  I would recommend going with NEi Nastran and Femap saving the $15,000 and using it for something else. Just my 2 cents.    

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close