×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NEC interpretation issue

NEC interpretation issue

NEC interpretation issue

(OP)
I want to know if my interpretation of 110.14(C) is correct.

Can I use the 75°C column ampacities for all gauges? (given the fact that I use 75°C or 90°C insulation and my terminals allow for 75°C wires)

I'm 99% certain that I can, but I want to make sure.
I've seen a lot of devices that allow the use of 75°C wires (especially breakers), and this would prove very useful for feeders.

Thanks in advance.

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Yes, as long as EVERYTHING in the path is listed or labeled for 75°C use -- AND as long as the ambient temperature does not exceed 30°C (86°F).

Based on NEC 2011 110.14(C) and table 310.15(B)(16).

That's my opinion!  Your AHJ's opinion (as well as your local code) may vary.

Good on ya,

Goober Dave

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Maybe.  It will depend on the type of wiring method being used - this is covered in the NEC Article for each wiring method.  

You also have to be aware of the terminations at the other end of the feeder - and any terminations in between.  

Also, the circuit breaker rating is based on use of a certain range of wire sizes being used - this is part of the UL rating.  So this (minimum requirement must be met regardless of the NEC.

We use 60 deg C rating for all feeders on 100 A circuits and smaller, regardless.  Saves a lot of worry.   

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Thanks for more clarity, David.

aeffects:  dpc is much more fluent in this area than I am, your question has many more facets than it seems on the surface.

I would also vote for sticking with 60°C wire for under-100A circuits. Lots less iffy.

Good on y'all,

Goober Dave

RE: NEC interpretation issue

DPC

Quote:

We use 60 deg C rating for all feeders on 100 A circuits and smaller, regardless.  Saves a lot of worry.
It may save worry but cost more $. There is no reason not to use the 75C rating for the conductors listed in 310.16 if the equipment terminals are listed for 75C. You can also use the 90C rating for derating the cable for temperature and number of conductors in conduits. Romex conductor is only listed for 60C.

RE: NEC interpretation issue

What dpc said and that is what I do too. Any perceived savings by doing otherwise is not worth the trouble or risk, especially when you are the specifying engineer.

 

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: NEC interpretation issue

rbulsara
What kind of risk would you be concerned with?

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Not getting 75 deg C rated equipment/terminals, especially rated less than 100A, despite specifying so. NEC has taken pains to explain that.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: NEC interpretation issue

I can see where that would be a big concern. It was my understanding that the new equipment was all rated for 75C.

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Panelboards and circuit breakers are generally rated for 75 deg wire these days, but when the other end of the wire goes to an heat pump package from Taiwan,a welding receptacle, or God only knows what, THAT end may very well only be rated for 60 deg C.  Then you could end up with one 50A circuit taken a different conductor size than the 50 A circuit right next to it.  It increases the risk of getting the wrong size wire pulled in, especially on Monday morning or Friday afternoon.

My recommended approach is conservative, I'll agree with that.  

 

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Under those conditions, I agree also.

RE: NEC interpretation issue

(OP)
I agree with you all, I do not intend to use 75C rating for branch circuits, maybe for some feeder circuits I will, but mostly wanted to make sure that I was getting things rigth.

Thank you all for your answers :).

RE: NEC interpretation issue

Here is what I believe the NEC requires:

1. If the device rating is under 100 Amps, and the temperature rating is NOT marked, you have to select Ampacity based on 60 degrees C.

2. Most equipment, even if under 100 Amps, is listed for 75 degrees C, so you use the 75 degree C column in the Article 310 Tables.

3. The Ampacity of NM sheathed cable, also known as "Romex", is always based on 60 degrees C.

--> I'm writing this from memory alone, and not citing NEC sections.  Somebody please jump on me if I'm wrong.

RE: NEC interpretation issue

You can use the 90°C column for Type NM for derating purposes if the resulting ampacity doesn't exceed the 60°C column value.  Essentially, you assume that Romex will be terminated on 60°C terminals.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources