×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Handrail/Guardrail Embedment
2

Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

(OP)
I've searched the several threads on this topic but haven't came to a clear understanding of the design of the embedment of handrail/guardrail in concrete.  I realize that there is some debate as to whether core drilling posts in concrete slabs or retaining walls is the ideal installation over other alternatives (base plates, cast-in-place sleeves such as EZ Sleeve, etc.), but in my experience embedment of steel, stainless, or aluminum (with coatings) posts in concrete with non-shrink grout is commonplace.  Can someone clarify the procedure to calculate the required embedment depth?  Or even point me to some resources?  Thanks!

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

I have never seen a resource on this, but I just make sure the forces are in equilibrium.  At the base of a guardrail post, there will be a lateral force and a moment.  These must be resisted by bearing pressures within the core.

DaveAtkins

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Resolve the moment at the base and apply the force couple in a triangular distribution, then iterate the required depth.  It should work out to be about 2-1/2 to 4 inches.  Don't forget that you have to consider that you have to apply an upward load to the post as well as the lateral load (though not concurrently).....most codes state that you have to apply the loads (200 lb concentrated load or 50 plf) in any direction.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Thanks Cap and Ron, glad to know we have been doing it right but will recheck with the formal method... That is the first published resource I have seen on the subject.

Anecdotal - I have noticed several failures when the handrails are placed in concrete sidewalks or slabs very close to the edge, failed via a shear crack where the edge of the concrete spalled completely off. If its a structural slab and you can call out for an "insurance" rebar at that edge, its always nice :)

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

(OP)
Thanks for the replies guys.  However, I'm still kinda confused.  I can resolve the moments for the various load conditions no problem (assuming the rail post is a cantilever beam fixed at the base in the concrete), but I'm not clear on exactly how to apply the triangular distribution and iterate the req'd depth as Ron mentioned.  I appreciate Cap's resource, but the equations presented on page 3 of the pdf for embedment seem to discuss beams w/ flanges; not sure how to modify for a round or square handrail post.  Thanks again for the help.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

The moment must be resolved into a couple, with the two forces being located at the centroids of the equal and opposite triangular bearing pressures.  The horizontal force causes a uniform bearing pressure.  Superimpose the uniform bearing pressure on the triangular bearing pressures.

DaveAtkins

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

I don't like to do this, I've had to fix too many where the rain has slipped into the joint, either rusting the pipe or sleeve if there is one, or freezing and breaking the concrete.

If I'm stuck with using a core, I use two opposing, rectangular bearing stress blocks, one from the top to the halfway point, the other from the halfway point to the bottom. This makes my moment arm half the depth of the core. It is tempting to use triangular blocks and make the moment arm two thirds of the depth, but that assumes unyielding pipe and is unconsevative.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

(OP)
I'm having problems visualizing the stress blocks or triangular distributions that you guys mentioned.  If someone has time and the means, a brief sketch might clear this up for me.  Thanks again.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

And yes, I got lazy. This is not how I do "real" sketches. It's Friday evening.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

slickdeals,

The sketch shows resistance to the moment, but not the lateral load.

paddingtongreen,

I think a triangular bearing assumption is more realistic, and conservative.

DaveAtkins

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

(OP)
Thanks for the sketch.  Assuming that the sketch is correct (rect. dist. instead of triangular) and calling the resultant of each stress block R, then M = R*D/2, correct?  M is a known, but is R a function of the compressive strength of the grout?  Thanks again; maybe its just too late on a Friday and I can't think anymore...
 

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Guys, don't forget that there is a net lateral force, too, not just a moment.  I do something similar to Ron, just a little different.  I'll post a sketch when I can.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

(OP)
Thanks Ron!  That clears things up alot.  For the lateral force, you would just do the same thing, but with a uniform loading, correct?  Also, how do you know that for in this case the stress block area is E/3?

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

adamt83...the E/3 is a depth assumption simply because that is the most heavily stressed part of the triangle.  Depending on contact area, there might be less stress but this is relatively conservative.

Same for lateral force, though it can be argued that a smaller stress block applies for the shear area.  In actuality, the conservative approach would be to consider single shear through the concrete at the centerline of the post, extending E/3 downward, and to the outside edge of the concrete.  Interior doesn't matter since the area of concrete in shear is way too large to be of consequence.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

OK, thanks to all for the data.   

But when I build handrails into a slab or existing concrete sidewalk, I'm limited since the "base" is already solid.  

What " works" - but I emphasize! not analyzed - is to core drill the sidewalk all the way through the concrete to dirt.  If a slab, go down no more than 6 inches - since the core drill jams out any deeper.   I've had no problems with holes only 4 inches deep, but prefer to go further if the sidewalk allows it.

On porches or wlakways in the open air, sometimes I can only go 3 inches deep before I bore through.   If so, then I have to fill/plug/block off the bottom of the hole so the concrete doesn't just slide through the opening.   

Plan on a 1-1/4 dia pipe (or equal) as the vertical, and get a 3.5 inch core drill.  4 dia if you can find one.  The bigger the hole the easier it is to force the grout/concrete around the pipe without making a mess.  Build and install the handrail pipe so it goes 5+ inches deeper than the surface, but doesn't hit any dirt.  

Pour/insert/tamp the "expanding" grout/concrete around the post so you slightly over-fill the hole to force water runoff.  

Keep the post supported overnight.  Test the top of the handrail at 200 lbf the next day.   

Note again: This is not a designed solution, but a construction "solution" report.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

racookpe1978...I would not test the post to full load the next day.  Most grouts are not that good!

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Ron, your diagram presupposes that there is pressure on the pipe before the moment is applied, otherwise you could not have pressure on both sides simultaneously. I think your triangles should not overlap.  

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Michael...I think you're right...I considered that, but in the interest of a "quickie" I drew it as shown, without any further thought.

RE: Handrail/Guardrail Embedment

Racookpe,

You should be using a 1 1/2 standard pipe not 1 1/4"
A 200# concentrated load at 42" above grade requires a section modulus of at least .263 if you are using a code that permits a 1/3 stress increase for guardrails.

While fence pipe can be obtained in grade 50 steel most handrails are made with A53 steel which is 35 KSI with an allowable bending stress of 24 KSI.

A Pipe 1 1/4 STD has a section modulus of only .235.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources