×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Impeller trimed and Flow increased
4

Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Impeller trimed and Flow increased

(OP)
Hi,
We have trimed the impeller of a centrifugal pump and after triming the impeller this pump flow has increased and load has reduced.
I'm confused with this as I know by triming the impeller will reduce flow and reduce load on motor.
Could any one share his experience with me if have this type of problem.
thanks

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

How much did you trim it?

Sounds like you have significantly affected the curve, perhaps even too much.  Load is essentially the product of head x flow.
Head will reduce with a trimmed impeller.  If you reduce it too much, even more flow at such a reduced discharge head could easly result in a reduced total load.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Was it at full diameter initially? If the impeller intruded into the volute area slightly,  you could lose efficiency from friction there.

Also if a better underfile was performed, you could trim a little and potentially increase head.

If you trimmed because you were close to overloading the motor, it's possible that your speed increased.
If no speed increase, then for some reason your efficiency has gone up. Not sure I would classify that as a problem.

 

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Recheck your flow measurements / calibration of the measuring equipment.
 

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

The only explanations that would make any sense to me, assuming what you are telling us is in fact correct and measurements are accurate is,
1. it is a poorly designed impeller and there is too much overlap of blades effecting the discharge off the impeller into the volute, trimming back on diameter may have overcome this problem, ie opened up the discharge area.
or
2. Trimming back the impeller has altered the discharge angle of the blade which has changed the flow characteristics.

A little more info might help-  pump size and type, impeller diameter and trim amount.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Might also be interesting to know precisely how much volume of metal was removed.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

And, how are you measuring the flow?  I have less confidence in flow measuring equipment than most other types of instrumentation.  If you reduced your head significantly, and your Flow Element isn't pressure compensated, it may need recalibration.

And BigInch, can I get eye burn from looking at your signature?

rmw

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

MIANCH,

You have not mentioned the type of drive for your pump, and I suspect that you have no useful data on the actual shaft speed for your pump either before or after trimming the impeller.  If you don't know the shaft speed accurately, it is very easy to make erroneous evaluations of pump performance.

I share rmw's doubts regarding the likely accuracy of flow measurement.  It would be no surprise to find that instrument and test inaccuracies could indicate an increased flow rate when reality is just the opposite.

I've seen seemingly careful tests of pump performance carried out over a period of years with the intention of evaluating deterioration of pump performance due to wear, but review of the resultant data showed performance deterioration followed by performance improvement with no repairs or modifications to the pump.  The only certain conclusion that could be drawn from the tests was that the pump was actually running, and it was performing tolerably well.  The apparent variations were all within a range that was obviously due to the reasonable uncertainty inherent with the instrumentation that was used (all excellent quality and carefully calibrated).  Simply stated, if your instrumentation is good for +/- 5%, don't try to conclude anything from an apparent difference of 3% between two tests.

Valuable advice from a professor many years ago:  First, design for graceful failure.  Everything we build will eventually fail, so we must strive to avoid injuries or secondary damage when that failure occurs.  Only then can practicality and economics be properly considered.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

What did Mom always tell you.
Never look into the welding flash!
Don't stare at a solar eclipse!
Don't go outside when it's lightning!
Listen to your mother!

PPE is now required in this and a few other forums.
 

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

and make sure you always wear clean underwear.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

(OP)
Hi,
Pump Data is here,
V=60m^3/hr
DeltaP=8.83 barg
Shut off pr=14.8 barg
BHP=34kw
Drive HP=39kw
Suction temp=355^0c
Service = Gas oil
Before triming pump was not able to pump more than 35m^3/hr and after triming pump is able to pump 50m^3/hr before the trip load that is 65 amps.
Hope you will make some more clear assumption which I can't do it for understanding this problem.
One more thing biginch asked about amount of material (weight) that idon't know because my company did this job with prevate workshop.
Thanks
MIANCH
 

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Inlet and outlet diameters?
Impeller dimension before trim,
and after trim?
Operating speed?
would help.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

At that temperature could you have been having NPSHa problems before?  Has the temperature changed?  Any changes made to the suction or delivery piping at the same time as the trimming was done?

Katmar Software
Engineering & Risk Analysis Software
http://katmarsoftware.com

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

2
I probably have a different perspective on this than most of the others.  If this was a pipeline application, it might be that the pump is run with no control valve.  This would be a case where the pump would run at the intersection of the pump curve and the system curve.  Cutting the impeller down should reduce the pump head which would reduce the flow rate in this type of system.

However, I suspect you have a system that is more like the type I see in a refinery that use some sort of flow control.  In these systems, they don't run to the intersection of the pump curve and the system curve.  They run to some constraint.  The constraint might be a flow target set by the process engineers. It might be holding a constant level upstream or downstream.  Or, it might be something like motor amps.  If your operators have a meter to check motor amps, they might be controlling the flow to keep from tripping the motor off.  If the flow is controlled by pinching on a valve, then this makes perfect sense.  When the impeller was trimmed, the performance of the pump would change based on the affinity laws.  As impeller diameter is reduced, the brake horsepower drops as the cube of the diameter.  The pump head drops as the square of the diameter.  So, if the operators were pinching down on a valve to keep from tripping the motor off, they would be able to get more flow after the cut because of the reduction in BHP.  

I could describe this another way.  With the larger impeller, you were building more head than you needed and dropping it down across a pinched valve. This is wasteful and inefficient.  After the impeller was trimmed, the valve was opened further because the motor horsepower was lower, even at the same flow.  Less energy was being wasted by the pinched valve. This energy would then be available to push more flow through the system.  

Please confirm if the flow was being pinched back before and after the impeller was cut down.  
 

Johnny Pellin

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

"Before triming pump was not able to pump more than 35m^3/hr and after triming pump is able to pump 50m^3/hr before the trip load that is 65 amps."

From this, I gather that the limit on flow is due to overloading the motor. Pretty important piece of information if I read this right.

Trimming has reduced your head and power required at a given flow. You are now running further out on the curve before hitting your 65 amps. No mystery here.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

MIANCH,

From the quantitative information in your second posting, it certainly appears that JJPellin's and 1gibson's responses provide the most coherent explanation of the situation.  Such a dramatic variation in output could only be be explained by something external to the pump.

Valuable advice from a professor many years ago:  First, design for graceful failure.  Everything we build will eventually fail, so we must strive to avoid injuries or secondary damage when that failure occurs.  Only then can practicality and economics be properly considered.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

JJ There's no difference in the system curve, pipeline or refinery, if the system curve includes the effects of the control valve, as it should, or whatever other flow element you have there, be it pipe, valve, pump, orifice plate, etc.  Each piece is simply a flow element with a specific pressure drop (or increase, in the case of a pump).   What the pump sees is only the sum total of all pressure drops in the discharge at the current flowrate, no matter what any given flow element happens to be called, be it pipe, reducer, fitting, half-closed ball valve, or a discharge control valve.  Each flow element is simply a pressure drop as a function of its instantaneous flow.  The system curve is just the sumation of the head loss of all downstream elements calculated for each and every flowrate the system could possibly see.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Ok.  The OP only posted a single delta-P across the pump, and a single shutoff head figure.  Those numbers should've changed when the impeller was trimmed, yet we have no data for that.  Thus JJ assumes the guy has no idea what the installed head was before and after...not a bad assumption in my mind, and at least as likely as a reputable pump manufacturer selling an impeller so grossly oversized as to impede output flow and head performance.  But, I'm making the assumption of the word "reputable"...

And we all know what happens when we ASSume.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

If the system curve had been changed after impeller trimming, by modifying any of the flow elements fitted in the discharge line, then the pump would operate at the intersection of the new performance curve with the new system curve (and affinity laws become meaningless). In this case it is possible to notice a flow increase as a combination of a trimmed impeller and a reduced pressure drop (system curve rotates clockwise).
IMO It seems strange the OP has not taken into account any discharge line modification

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

I should have learned by now to choose my terminology more carefully. Of course a complete system curve includes the control valve.  But, the use of a control valve makes the system curve variable and not fixed.  It is unlikely that the OP would neglect to notice that his downstream piping was changed at the same time as the impeller trim.  But, it would be very easy to imagine that the operators would change a control valve position after the trim because the constraint they were running up against had changed.  The real comparison I should have made would be between a system with a constant system curve and one with a variable system curve.  

The other consideration I took into account is human nature. If the operators are charged with moving as much product as possible, they will tend to operate the pump up to some hard constraint.  If the constraint is changed, they will tend to run up to the new constraint.  If the motor trips, this is probably an inconvenience to the operators.  They will tend to try to find a way to avoid this inconvenience.  If they can do this by pinching on a valve, it would not surprise me that they would do so.  

 

Johnny Pellin

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Since a good part of BEP efficiency is caused by matching incoming flowrate to impeller bite, if they were operating near BEP previously, but then trimmed the impeller, they may have managed to match bite more effectively and increased efficiency as well.  Hard to say without the spec sheet and the operating logs to go along with it, but I don't have time for that anyway.     

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

A typical "my pump doesn't work, why not?" posting in which it is the pump at fault (as usual), nothing to do with the overall system, the operators, or changes made to the system,information which has to be squeezed out of the OP as if it were gold.
Guess it keeps us occupied and exercise the old brain.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

(OP)
Hi,
I got information on impeller triming,'ie' oreginal impeller dia meter was 366mm and 10mm is trimed.
Now the question is why manufacturers are not consulting with process engineers and validating the design parameters before for manufacturing the pump or any another equipments.
Thanks
MIANCH
 

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Seems someone is not listening, it now the manufacturer at fault.  

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Is there any kind of pressure regulator out there in the system downstream of the pump.  Not a flow regulator, a pressure regulator.  If there is a back pressure regulator that is throttling the pump to prevent overpressure downstream, its influence would be reduced upon trimming the pump impeller which resulted in a lower discharge head.

How about a by-pass or minimum flow regulator?

However, 10mm in 336 isn't a huge reduction.

rmw

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

(OP)
Hi,
No presure regulator on this pump, this kero/ gas oil fractionator bottom pump for the bottom side pump. After triming the pump,the only change is control of FV increased around OP 2%.
Only apparent change is only FV out put and no other change.
Hope you will make some more assumption about this meyth.
Thanks
MIANCH

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Any info about total differential head?

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Artisi,

It seems that we misunderstand everything.  The pump manufacturers and others are expected to provide the proper pump and advice based on inadequate and misleading information.  I'm sure that a variation of this philosophy is behind the attraction of VSD's to pretend to compensate for the effects of misinformation while providing assurance of optimal pump performance and dramatic energy savings (reality being both insignificant and unimportant).

Valuable advice from a professor many years ago:  First, design for graceful failure.  Everything we build will eventually fail, so we must strive to avoid injuries or secondary damage when that failure occurs.  Only then can practicality and economics be properly considered.

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

After 30 odd years in the pump business I have come to realise that;
1. it is nearly always the pump at fault.
2. if not the pump, then it's entirely the manufacturers fault.
3. there are no other causes which can affect pump performance as the pump should always fit the application perfectly.   

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

(OP)
ione,
There is no difference found in differential head.
Thanks
MIANCH

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

MIANCH, it is about time you realised that it is unlikely the increased flow is the result of the impeller diameter change, the cause is external to the pump.  

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

1.    Flow rate increased after impeller trimming
2.    No change in total differential head
3.    Brake horse power decreased.

BHP = Q*Ht*SG/(3960*pump efficiency)

The pump efficiency has changed, so the operating point is not on the same system curve as that it was before trimming
 

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

(OP)
ione,
my pump head is 179m and differential head is 3.7m. Deisgn flow is 60m^3/hr and efficiency is 43%.
After triming why  BHP increased and remaining power where is getting utilized.
Thanks
MIANCH

RE: Impeller trimed and Flow increased

Why don't you plot the before and after pump curve so we can see what you are talking about.  Put the numbers on a spreadsheet and draw where EXACTLY the pressure gauges are located with respect to the centerline of the pump and the pump nozzles.

1. Show us exactly how you did the head calculation in your spreadsheet
2. Is your flow meter calibrated
3. Are your pressure gauges calibrated
4. Send a picture of your installation showing the pressure gauges

What you are saying is occurring is impossible. To engineers, who understand pumps, you are not providing much information for anyone to comment on
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources