×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

(OP)
Has anyone observed a reduction in shaft adhesion for increasing diameters of bored piles in similar subsurface condition?
In a recent project, shaft adhesions were developed from in-situ and laboratory testing. These values were confirmed/modified based on a number of CAPWAP analyses undertaken on 600mm diameter bored test piles.
A collegue suggested that the skin friction values should have been reduced for larger diameter piles (900, 1050 and 1200 mm diameter).
 

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

I've not seen anything like that before.  If you look at any of the "reduction" procedures (whether Tomlinson, Focht, etc) none have an additional reduction due to shaft scale.  Interesting question - I'll be watching to see if any other colleagues out there have seen such a reduction.

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

I noticed it when i did augercast tiebacks.  The difference in pullout was barely noticeable, not proportional to surface area as you would expect.

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

(OP)
Big H and PSlem, Thanks for the comments. I await with bated breathe further posts. My collegue mumbled something about Poisson's ratio, but I have my doubts.
PSlem, could you elucidate? Do you mean that you noted very little differece for various diameters? This seems counter intuitive.

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

We had a crane hung lead with hollow center auger with cables and a lost bit.  Auger diameters varied from 10" to 12" to 14" depending on what was available in yard.  I saw almost no difference and recommended to the office they only purchase the smaller as it used half the grout of the larger. The grout was an 11 bag ready mix.  My thought at the time was why grout needed a strength so much more than soil. Littlejohn, I think, said it had to do with relative stiffness of a rigid inclusion versus the soil. I think it had to be 5 or 6 times stiffer and a larger bore didn't really offer more.   We went to high pressure grouting shortly after this and totally eliminated any failures.  30 year old memories so can't add much more.

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

It is normal practice within the UK to limit shaft adhesion on larger diameter piles, typically those greater than about 900mm diameter.

Auger rotatation, crowd and concreting can be closely controlled using the rig computer for smaller diameter CFA piles, however greater soil disturbance should be expected for larger diameter piles.  Other factors such as the time taken to bore and concrete the pile wil also affect the shaft friction.

For comparison, design of small diameter CFA pies to Eurocode allows us to use an alhpa of 0.7 on shaft within London Clay, if auger rotation & rig records are carefully monitored.  We would normally reduce alpha to 0.45 for large diameter piles within the same soils - even if the same rig were used to install the piles.

So yes, it's not uncommon for skin friction to reduce for larger piles.

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

Thanks for the information - but this seems to be "rule of thumb" - it would be nice to see some study that shows such reductions.  Where is the cut-off from 0.7 to 0.45?  I'm not discounting but I've just never seen anything for this - and the large diameter piles they install offshore - what Focht and Srinivasin (?) developed - the "lambda" coefficient - nothing on size . . .

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

(OP)
Rockmynci; thanks for the information. I tend to agree with BigH. However, one should certainly consider time to drill and time to pour. Over many years, I have found that for bored piles, 600 and 750mm diameter holes are the quickest to drill, 9oo next, then 600 and less; with 1200 diameter being the slowest (lots of spoil to move, large concrete volumes etc). This may seem counter-intuitive; but with small diameters the flights may only extend 200mm or less past the post and many digs required to get the hole drilled.
I am not sure that "greater soil disturbance should be expected in larger diameters" Why?
I should clarify my original query to add that we were installing bored piles, not CFA. Also we groove the hole after drilling to target depth.

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

Typically, if the piles being installed using a CFA technique, the higher alpha values will be used.  When a rotary/bored technique is used, the lower values would be used.  This mainly comes back to the monitoring information available on the rigs and greater control on drilling with CFA.

If you're comparing bored piles of different diameters then I would agree the skin friction value shouldn't change significantly, so I'll table an amendment to my earlier comment!

What sort of soil profile were the piles in?

RE: Shaft Adhesion in Bored Piles of Different Diameters.

(OP)
Rockmynci: the piles were drilled in very stiff to hard residual clays of medium plasticity, grading to weathered rock at depth. The rock is a slightly metamorphosed sandstone/siltstone, varying from extremely low to low strength. Typically all piles were founded above the water table.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources