×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Green Power Claims

Green Power Claims

Green Power Claims

(OP)
When will we get to the point of truth about renewable energy?   I read in the local newspaper last weekend that a Biomass plant in Wisconsin costing $250,000,000 will produce 55MW and supply "electricity" for 40,000 "typical" homes. Ok, that's 1375 watts each. The same paper published that a local wind project would produce 165MW and supply electricity for 45,000 homes. The vast number of readers are no doubt ignorant of these riduclous claims. I write to the author of these stories in the paper whenever he writes them but I think we need a national standard, possibly developed by IEEE to set a basis for measuring the energy conversion value of these projects. Otherwise, it's all snake oil. And intelligent decisions can't be made.
Why would anyone invest in wind when biomass electricity supplies 3 times as many homes per MW!

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims


Biomass 55MW/40000hm = 1375 W/hm
Wind 165MW/45000hm = 4125 W/hm

Frankly, all I see is a possible difference in how they define the amount of power used per home, and both numbers are technically correct for different reasons.  1375 W/hm is roughly consistent with average usage, while 4125 W/hm is roughly consistent with peak usage.  

As to why a newspaper might mix the units, is that really that surprising?

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

the difference is TIME.  The power plants are listed at maximum output rate, remember, energy is in KW-hours.

The biomass will be running about 100% of the time at its rated 55MW or (55*24*365)  = 480,000 mw-hrs/year

The wind will only run at peak output about 40% of the time, so (165 * 24 *265 * .40) = 540,000 mw-hr/year

The same type formula must be used for solar panel.  At best you'll only see about 25% of a solar panels output over the year.  A 3KW array will only make 6570 kw-hrs.  That only $800 per year in savings for a home unit.  For power sold wholesale or the avoided cost, its only $250/year.  That 3KW system will cost $10,000 after rebates.


I point out the dolars so you can see the big picture.  That biomass plant will save about $19,000,000 per year. The operating expense will be in the $4,000,000 per year range.  Transportation of fuel (biomass) will reduce annual revenues to the $10,000,000/year range.  That means it will take 25 years before the plant breaks even, not including the time value of money.

RE: Green Power Claims

(OP)
IRstuff, I'm wondering how you arrive at 1375 watts as average use for a home? It's true that not all systems run at once. But many systems have close to a 50% duty cycle. For example, a refrigerator running at 500w runs probably more the 50% of the time. A modern furnace blower will be at least that much or more sice they commonly run continuous blowers now at reduced speed. Say 300watts average. say 300watts of lighting for half the day. A 200 watt computer running half the day. That's 1300w and we haven't come to the heavy hitters yet. Electric water heaters, well pumps, washer and electric dryer. true the duty cycle on these items is likely in the 10% range but the watts required to do laundry will be more like 4 or 5 kw. Not to mention the electric range and plugin electric car in the garage with it's 30% duty cycle and 2 or 3kw load.
Utilites will install a 25KVA transformer to serve a 3 homes in a subdivision. or a 10kva for a rural site with one home.

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims

I didn't see where it said it would supply all the electricity to these homes, only supply electricity. I don't think whether the homes were crappy or average would make much difference.

AA batteries supply electricity, albeit DC, to millions of homes. Newspapers are a money making business (or try to be) so I don't get surprised when some weasel-wording is enocuntered. They have to sell advertisements and kiss whatever fundaments that can insure their survival. By the same logic, solar power is already heating millions of homes, without the cost and inconvenience of power plants or pollution.

Does that sound squirrelish? I read in a newspaper how one State (Arizona I think) decided that since the Sun provides so much energy that is used, the State has already met its renewable energy goals without the mess of power plants, investment or pollution.

RE: Green Power Claims

I won't claim to have done an exhaustive study, since I base my observations on my own usage and what I've heard from others about their utility bills.  

My usage is currently running ~900 kWh/month = 1232 W average usage.  Usage will vary up to ±80% over the course of the year, depending on how AC-dependent the household is.

Peak power is on the order of 5 kW, since that's the largest solar panel system that RecSolar sells.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

1375 is a very close to the average home consumption in Spain.

Its a pretty easy number to "home" in on, if you check the average power consumption statistics of homes on a regional or, in some cases, a national scale and for a yearly average.  There can be considerable variation in richer vs poorer regions, and between winter and summer usage, but as an "average" number over a year 1375 is reasonable and relatively easy to verify.

RE: Green Power Claims

And wind will only be 40% in your highly localized in time and space dreams.  Spain's national average is 12%-18% of nameplate rated capacity.

RE: Green Power Claims

(OP)
IRstuff,
I get your point.
But don't you agree that the statement in the paper that the plant "will provide electricity to 40,000 homes". implies all of their electricity? Remember the paper is written for the mass of people who do not have a technical background. And as someone else said, you might as well say the plant provides electricity for every home in the country. Afterall it is a unified grid.
I just want the average Joe out there to realize what the true scope of the project is.
I think it would also to be good to get into the fuel delivery issuer. Semi trucks delivery the fuel are going to give a lot more CO2 emission per joule delivered than the train delivering coal. Or the pile line of gas.

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims

It "implies" all, but is calculated on the average home use. (that's a period, full stop there)

RE: Green Power Claims

Again, you asking for engineering accuracy in a commodity newspaper.  I'm just happy that they can spell "MW" correctly, and you're asking for engineering thoroughness.

In either case, the ""will provide electricity to 40,000 homes" phrase is pretty much moot, since it's not really an actionable piece of information.  Even the ostensibly accurate "55MW" and "165MW" numbers don't tell you bupkis about their steady-state output, their surge output, etc.

As indicated by another poster above, each technology has different strengths and weaknesses, which are not even touched upon in the article, so why is the number of home supplied such a big deal?

If you want a full engineering and scientific analysis, including ancillary factors, a newspaper is not the place to get it, not would I want it there, since it would bore the average reader to tears, given that they can't understand a tenth of the science behind the analysis.   

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

IRStuff,

I disagree with your 1/10 th figure. Left out a zero I presume smile

RE: Green Power Claims

Or perhaps my ego.... Do you think?  No. Don't answer that.

RE: Green Power Claims

(OP)
At times like this another design Engineer here and I like to say we've been saddled with the burden of knowledge.
In other words, If we didn't know anything we'd be a lot happier. Particularly about paying riduclous prices since we'd be confident the result would be a much improved environment.

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims

Regardless, more than half of the world's proven reserves are in a particularly annoying part of the world that we'd wash our hands of, if not for the oil.  And given the particularly tiny reserves of the US, we ought to be looking at completely getting away from oil, both for security and stability.  

While some would take that as an argument for finding more of our own oil, the likelihood of finding sufficient reserves is pretty low.  Even if we find every drop we think exists within our national boundaries, at our consumption rate, we'd exhaust our own reserves in 13.7 yrs.  And that's assuming that we'd have access to all that oil at reasonable prices.  It's been clearly demonstrated that even US oil companies will sell to the highest bidder, and we therefore do not technically have secure supplies, even within our own national boundaries.  And our so-called allies in OPEC are merrily gouging us and laughing all the way to the bank.

So, it just seems prudent to look at alternatives.  I think there are sufficient reasons to do this, even ignoring the environmental part of it.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

(OP)
My whole point wasn'tt to say we shouldn't consider alternatives. I just want to do it intelligently. Unfortunately, public opinion is almost entirely swayed by the media. And politicians are only slightly swayed by voters (a good thing) but they are more influenced by lobbyists, each selling a project for gain. All this makes finding and developing good alternatives more or less of a hit and miss prospect.  

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims

The media merely reports what's told to it; the fact that they can't get the math consistent is a pointed example of their inability to calculate their way out of a wet paper bag.

No doubt every media outlet has its own agenda, but the news sources, i.e., the cartels, companies, lobbyists, and NGOs, are the real manipulators of perceived reality.

Even at that, the complexity of doing a "real" comparison of alternatives is non-trivial, since a "real" comparison would need to include ALL the relevant factors, and the analysis alone would be a huge money sink.  Particularly since no one is willing to agree on where to draw the line for a strictly consistent comparison.

Nonetheless, the reason there are no good alternatives is because there are no good alternatives.  A thread in another forum here drives the point home in that the OP is looking for an alternative energy storage, and the "best" solution is still batteries.  Oil is indeed an magical elixir with its superior energy density and relatively simple conversion to electricity.  A really good battery might have something like 1/10th the energy density of oil.  If there was something that was even close, ala dilithium crystals, or whatever, there's be no arguing it.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

I get frustrated with stories that botch even the most basic energy concepts. More often than not we hear "kilowatts per hour" or "powering 40,000 homes per year" - even in reputable publications. Maybe we engineers need to figure out a way to educate the media on these very basic ideas. They need to understand what they're hearing or anyone doing an interview with a reporter might as well be speaking Swahili.

Alan
"The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is." Unk.

RE: Green Power Claims

Not sure about other countries, but in the US, there's very little interest in such things.  We, as engineers, can lead the masses to science education, but they're obviously not going to partake, and it doesn't bother them in the least, despite whatever lamentations anyone proffers.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

That's why its the way it is.  Nobody out there has any idea what a MW is, so they try to dumb the actual capacity figure down to the number of homes statistic.  Most Joeplumbers can wrap their heads around some small number of homes, 8 or 10 in the neighboorhood or so.  Extending that analogy accurately past 15 or 20 I think would be quite a step, yet I think they might be able to imagine what 40,000 homes look like, at least in terms of a small city or something, but MW.. no hope.

I think it would be a whole lot better to start telling them how much they would have to pay for that amount of electricity, if it all went through their meter in one month.

RE: Green Power Claims

That actually would make it worse.  Our local utility has about 5 tiers of pricing, coupled with numerous add-ons and scale factors.  A simple, net, unit pricing is nearly impossible to figure out from my bill.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

Well... we'll just have to take the weighted average.

I am curious about the rate structure though.  Could you post it? or link to it.  Here we have the possibility to choose day or night. Currently 0.13 Eu/kWh 10am-10pm day and 0.06 at night, or you can select one rate (near average) for 24 hours.
Day_night and One_rate.  The Day_night options requires meter replacement.

I'm going to check into getting another line/meter and running the pumps on the One_rate during the day, then switching to the Day_night meter at night, but something tells me that that would be impossible.

RE: Green Power Claims

The example page is not exactly readable, but if you zoom the picture up, you can sse that (11) shows a 5-tier pricing structure.  Note, however, that the stuff in (9) shows that the tiered structure is applied to two separate accounts, delivery and generation.  This is further dicotimized by the fact that the residential customers have a different bill than business customers.

http://www.sce.com/newbill/residential3.htm


Here's a simplified version of the tiers:
http://www.sce.com/CustomerService/billing/tiered-rates/

Business rates are further divided into usage classes:
http://www.sce.com/CustomerService/rates/business/

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

Five pricing tiers, and day/night metering, sounds like our income tax schedules.

And the things we do to avoid taxes. And what you will be doing to avoid utility rates.

I do understand the meter charge, and the cost of electricty, and demand (Flat fee, cost of fuel, and cost of equipment). But why must we make it so difficult with all the additional schemes, and rates?

 

RE: Green Power Claims

So you think you're actually getting something other than screwed.

RE: Green Power Claims

IRstuff's is for southern California wher the government has mandated they switch to alternative energy.  They also have huge numbers of electric cars.  Not one of those electric car users realize that when they charge their car that the energy cost is in the last tier!!!  They are paying $6/gallon equivalent for their transportation fuel and the pollutants for that car are in someone else's backyard, but they feel good about it.

RE: Green Power Claims

Huge numbers?  Really?  It's an absolute rarity to even see SmartCar, which isn't even electric.  I see maybe one a week, tops.

As for full-blown electric cars, nary a one.  I'm not sure where you're getting your statistics, but there are nearly zero charging stations in Southern California, and that puts most of the 40-mile-range cars in a world of hurt as far as commuting is concerned.  My own commute sits at about 42 miles round-trip, and I certainly wouldn't want to risk running out of juice in the middle of my commute.  My previous commute was about 54 miles round-trip, well out of range, unless there was a charging station at work, which there isn't.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

(OP)
I doubt there are more than a handfull of true electric (plug in ) cars in California.    But I do look forward with glee to the day when the number of electric cars plugged in at 5:00 causes rolling blackouts.
 

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims

Can you put solar panels on that electric car?

Screwed from electric rates? I only get my electricty from a non-profit electric company.

RE: Green Power Claims

my use of huge is relative to the rest of the US.

Oct. 23 (Bloomberg) -- California's push to lead U.S. sales of electric cars may result in higher power rates for consumers in the state, as a growing number of rechargeable vehicles forces utilities to pay for grid upgrades.

The autos' effect on electricity fees is being reviewed by California's Public Utilities Commission this month as the most populous U.S. state will require Toyota Motor Corp., General Motors Co., Honda Motor Co., Ford Motor Co. and Nissan Motor Co. to sell more plug-in vehicles from late 2011.

Power companies including Southern California Edison, the state's largest, have to install new transformers and meters to handle greater demand and prevent blackouts when autos are being charged at outlets. Utility rates will rise to cover the costs, said Travis Miller, a Morningstar Inc. analyst in Chicago.

"If you look at the kind of money that will be needed for a full smart grid and support for electric vehicles, then you are talking about a substantial amount," Miller said in a phone interview. The spending may total "multiple billions" of dollars over a decade or more, he said.

From model years 2012 through 2014, the largest carmakers by volume in California must sell about 60,000 plug-in hybrids and electric cars combined, according to the state Air Resources Board. President Barack Obama is aiming for 1 million plug-in cars on U.S. roads by 2015 to curb tailpipe emissions and cut dependence on foreign oil.



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=avRy8RxhwZwg

RE: Green Power Claims

(OP)
I wonder how much connected load 60,000 plug-in hybrids equates to?
Hmmmm.... maybe, one biomass plant.

Neil

RE: Green Power Claims

Just because the car might be plugged in at 5:30 doesn't mean that charging has to start then. The charging could wait until the rates go down at night.  

RE: Green Power Claims

Residential rates, at least from Edison, are not dependent on time of day, only commercial rates are.

Assuming energy equivalent of 0.3 kWh/mi, the energy consumed for an average of 40 mi commutes for 60,000 cars comes to about 710 MW*hr.  Spread out over 12 hrs, that's only about 60 MW of load

 

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

I thought Fred Flintstone solved this issue long ago. Those fat little feet ran all day on bronto burgers, long before they changed to oil.

RE: Green Power Claims

But, his commute was a lot shorter...

Nowadays, even if you could manage 20 mph, it would take you an hour to get to work.




....oh, it does take that long, now...

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Green Power Claims

Have they included in there calculations, the reduced demand because of green lights (light bulbs, not stop lights)?

And what would be the expected maximum charging rate for each car? If it is a 120 V plug in, the maximum would about 12 A * 120V = 1440 VA each * 60000 = 86.4 MVA.

If every consumer, who could no longer buy an edison bulb, instead purchased a 20 W green bulb (example, I don't know of any bulbs this size) (60W-20W) = 40 W saved each, * number of customers (2 Million) = 2000000 *40 W = 80 MW saved.

The problem with any of this math, is that the load is probally growing anyway, and the electric grid expantion has to happen anyway.

So all this is pure spectulation. One large plant either entering or leaving your area could account for the same growth, or reduction in usage.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources