×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

LC resonator low amplitude?

LC resonator low amplitude?

LC resonator low amplitude?

(OP)
Hi All,
I'm trying to drive a piezo ultrasonic transducer with a capacitance of 1.6nF with an LC circuit. Here is the circuit diagram: http://min.us/icWNq4.jpg

The square function is at 60kHz. The Inductor I made myself by winding 20AWG enamel-coated wire around a 0.44in diameter x 0.75inch long plastic rod about 77 turns. It's done pretty sloppily - but I don't know if this will make a huge difference.

I measured the voltage on the collector of the PNP and am only getting a peak to peak of 10V. I played around with the frequency of the square function, and it seemed like 60 kHz gave the max amplitude from the LC circuit.

Is there a way I can increase the amplitude? Thanks and happy thanksgiving.

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

(OP)
I also put a 100uF electrolytic capacitor between +5 and ground. I forgot to include this in the diagram.

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

I'm not sure where to begin...

2N2222A is an NPN (Not Pointing iN), not a PNP (Pointing iN Please), transistor.

Transistor circuits tend to include the occasional resistor to control the currents in a voltage world. winky smile

I'm sure what your assumptions were, but voltage rise in a resonant (?) LC tank circuit requires Q and thus needs to lightly loaded. A parallel resonant circuit at resonance is essentially an open circuit.

...

It would better to start with the specs of your transducer and just start again.
 

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

Correction: "I'm not sure..."

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

(OP)
I think it's quite clear that I'm not an electrical engineer ;)

Yes, I wrote PNP incorrectly. If you look at the circuit diagram, I used the correct transistor. I forgot to include a resistor between the signal and base in the diagram.

Anyway, here is the circuit that I'm trying to mimic:
http://www.micro-examples.com/pics/090-ULTRASONIC-RANGER-schematic.png

Which comes back to my question, how can I increase the amplitude?

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

If you're using the same (or a similar) transducer as the Gavand schematic, and you trust him, then simply copy his circuit exactly. AND you would need to follow his guidance for the waveform emitted from the uC.

Otherwise, if you wish to make a different circuit, then you must start with the requirements ("...the specs of your transducer...") and work backwards from them. One cannot even begin to start a fresh circuit design without having the requirements (transducer) defined.

For Gavand's circuit, it seems (?) like he might be using a flyback effect where he 'loads up' the inductor, and then cuts off the transistor current allowing an inductive kickback to decay through the transducer. Maybe...

 

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

PS: His inductor probably isn't an air core. The value (330uH) and application hint that his inductor has a ferrite (or maybe iron) core.

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

(OP)
Yes I understand the flyback effect and that's what I'm using. It seems like the current is not shutting off fast enough, when the uC goes low, thus not generating a high enough voltage from the inductor. Maybe I can switch the transistor?

I do know the specs of my transducer. It has a capacitance of 1.6nF, which I wrote on the diagram. I added a large capacitor in parallel to decrease the size of the inductor to reach resonance.

I don't think an air core vs. ferrite core would make any difference on the voltage produced by the inductor. As I understand, air core should give higher voltages due to lack of hysteresis losses in the core.

I noted that the transistor got a bit warm if the incoming signal was continuous. I will try using a transistor with a higher slew rate and see what happens.  

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

"...I understand the flyback effect... ...I added a large capacitor....to reach resonance. ..."

Flyback effect .NE. resonance. Flyback effect is like an ignition coil; nothing to do with LC resonance.





 

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

0.4uF sounds a bit too large as the capacitor of a LC circuit at 60kHz. Try about 10...50nF, and a correspondingly larger inductance. The Q-value of the LC-circuit tends to go up, when the inductance is increased. You may also try to connect the transistor to a tap in (approximately) the middle of the winding. If the transistor is getting warm, try a shorter pulse.

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

Most ultrasonic transducers are driven by a pulse, very fast rise and fall time, extremely short duration. The idea is to produce a sound pulse (one pulse) and then measure the time it takes for that pulse to return.  

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

Depends on what the transducer is doing. The transducers used in ultrasonic cleaners are quite different in purpose to what you are describing.

Of course the OP could always tell us what the application is and then we wouldn't have to guess... poke
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

An ultrasonic cleaner might need a bit more 'oomph' than could be provided by a 2N2222A. winky smile

 

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

The schematic shows he's trying to make an ultrasonic ranging device, i.e. "ping" a small speaker, then listen for the return echo using a seperate microphone.  Agree with djs, the ping should be a single pulse, to minimize ringing and crosstalk to the pickup device.  But whatdoiknow, just a mech.

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

Remove the parallel capacitor.

Add inductance. Your homebrew coil is *about* 50uH (?), the schematic you're copying calls for 330uH. Consider using a core other than air; it's not common to see "kHz" and "air core" together (an overly generalized statement, but mostly true).

Better yet, just copy his (Gavand's) circuit exactly before fiddling with the design.

Good luck.



 

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

(OP)
One ping is usually not enough to produce an echo that is loud enough for the transducer to hear - I guess because of resistance to vibrations in the transmission medium and the object reflecting the sound waves. I am sending 10 pulses. It's a trade off between increasing minimum detection range to a longer range.

I think Ijl nailed it with the lower Q factor of the lower inductance coil. I suspected it's because there wasn't enough inductance, even though I reached the 60kHz resonance frequency by increasing the capacitance. The problem is that I didn't have any inductors or a suitable core material, and I wasn't about to wind a 10^4 turn inductor by hand to reach mH inductance.

As VE1BLL pointed out, non-air core inductors are usually used for kHz frequencies because the core increases the inductance for the same number of turns of wire when compared to air-cores, allowing less length of wire to be used. Thus the L/R ratio is higher  (Q=wL/R)

By using a smaller capacitor to reach the same resonance frequency, the Q factor of the capacitor is also larger. (Q=1/wCR)

Thank you for your help everyone, this is my first time experimenting with electronics. I must say that this is less intuitive to me than mechanical systems where I can feel and see what's going on.  

RE: LC resonator low amplitude?

You can't get more than 10V peak-peak with that circuit. There is no gain in the transistor when the collector swings down past 0V.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources