×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

$12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit
2

$12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

$12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
I own property in Northern Wi.that has an old abandoned highway running through it. At least 35 years ago someone,either my grandfather or uncle, placed a black plastic culvert under the road to reduce flooding and erosion.The local DNR issused a citation on 11/11/2010 for placing  'new' plastic culverts on the bed of a navigable stream without required depar
tment permit and in violation of state laws.

Questions:

1.Were there laws in place 30+ years ago that required us to get a permit?
2.Does anyone know what kind of attorney I should hire to fight this fine?
3.Can they require me to get a new permit after the fact?
  

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

You can usually research the state laws online. Look for their historical citations, and from those you can usually determine when they became effective.

You probably need a property rights attorney (not just a real estate attorney, but one who deals specifically with property rights), not necessarily a construction attorney.  The construction portion is straightforward...prove the age of the culvert.

If the road was abandoned, was the easement also abandoned?  Check property records for any recordings of such.  If the easement was abandoned and the roadway has been abandoned (you can make a strong case for this if there has been no maintenance of the culvert or roadway by county services), and all of the culvert is on your property, unless you are obstructing water rights or causing flooding, the construction is probably "grandfathered" (in this case literally and figuratively!).

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

The file in the link should answer your questions:

dha.state.wi.us/home/Decisions/DNR/2002/3-NE-01-454.pdf

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

TYPICAL CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1.Were there laws in place 30+ years ago that required us to get a permit?

The laws typically read: "no person may construct or maintain". They have you on the "maintain". It will not matter when it was built.

 2.Does anyone know what kind of attorney I should hire to fight this fine?

Any attorney with experience working with the DNR would due.

3.Can they require me to get a new permit after the fact?

If you want a culvert, You will probably have to hire an engineer to design a replacement culvert that meets the DNR requirements.


 

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

you may have a better case for suing the county/state for creating a nuisance on your property when they improperly abandoned the roadway. They apparently blocked the navigable stream when they constructed the road.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
I like the way you think cvg.
Thanks to the other responders for their imput.
I think I'm screwed according to the link provided by bimr.
However, I will consult with an attorney

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

"The laws typically read: "no person may construct or maintain". They have you on the "maintain". It will not matter when it was built."

Would ex post facto law apply in this case, particularly with respect to maintain? To me "maintain" is ambiguous. Does it mean maintain only what was construcuted after the law was enacted or does it mean maintain anything that was in existence prior to the law? It would seem if the intent was toward the latter the law would have to explain what it means not to maintain.

Best to consult a lawyer.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

The concept of "maintain" is taken from case law. If you read the WI case that is referenced above:

       X testified that since he and his wife have owned the property he has not actively performed any maintenance on the culvert. In the context of Wis. Stat. §30.123, "maintain" is not limited to actively performing maintenance but also includes passively allowing the culvert to continue in existence. The X's have maintained the
culvert since they became the owners of the property and are the proper party against whom the Department should direct the enforcement action.

Some follow-up questions:

What is meant by an "old abandoned highway"? Has the r/w owner abandoned the r/w? Who owns the r/w.

How do you place a "black plastic culvert" under the highway? Was this open cut?

Was "black plastic culvert" available 30 years ago?  



 

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

I agree with your definition of maintain. What I was questioning was the legislative intent of maintain. Did they mean that anything constructed prior to the statute had to be removed? If that were the case there must have been a lot of culverts removed in Wisconsin.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

I don't know what you want to do with it now, but...

The Federal laws were there 30 years ago, if you, or they, refer to and the water course is a navigable stream.  The Corps of Engineers have ultimate jurisdiction over all navigable streams everywhere in the USA as far as I know.  You may need a state permit too, but check with the local COE district office as well, 'cause you might not get a state permit until you get the Fed's OK, or v/v.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
The state of Wisconsin built a new road parallel to the old road sometime prior to 1965. At that time,I believe the state abandoned the old road. Dates are purely a guess on my part.

In looking at the culvert it would appear that the roadway was excavated, the culvert placed, and then covered by sand,rock, and the old asphalt. Unfortunately no one is alive who can fill in the blanks.

I'm not sure when black plastic pipe become avaiable. The 30-35 years is again, purely a guess based on my green grass frog culvert shooting days.

Is COE short for Corp of Engineers?

Thanks

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

the correct abbrev for US Army Corps of Engineers is USACE. You can probably build your culvert under one of the nationwide permits. However, the USACE will likely not require it since it has been there for years (possibly prior to authorization of the clean water act).  

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Their navigable stream authority was in effect about 100 years or more before the clean water act and wetlands protection policies ever came into being .. as I recall.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

no argument that the stream may be navigable, just that the 404 permit process came after the clean water act was authorized

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

This is going back some, but again as I recall, 404 is for  permits to discharge or to place fill or dredging material, and does not cover building things in or across a navigable streams.  Its also been almost as long since I looked at it too, but I could sware I made applications for several pipeline crossings and for the construction of a boat dock before the clean water act was ever passed.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

401 certification and 404 permitting are a major part of the clean water act. perhaps there were other types of permits for pipelines before that. a key part of the 404 permit process is affects to waters of the US which are generally defined as navigable streams, however were they are ephemeral it often extends to streams that are dry washes.  

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

One of those pipeline crossing was for the Intercostal Waterway.  The boat dock (private) was on a rather small bayou about a 1/2 mile upstream of its entering Matagorda Bay.  Permit was handled by the USACE Galveston District Office.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Is the road really abandoned? Do people use it? Call the DOT and County Highway Dept. To find the actual disposition of the old roadway easement. You may be able to tell the DNR that you are going to dig out the culvert and return the stream to its natural state. Ask them for a grant to assist.

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Excellent thought.  "Ask them for a grant to assist."

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
The road has not been used by the public in 50+ years.I believe the black
plastic pipe replaced a metal pipe that was destroyed by a logger 20-25 years ago. Again dates are WAG's on my part.
How do I find the age of the black corrugated pipe?
Where do I go to find out if the road and ROW were legally abandoned?
The old road was a state highway.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit


Pipe manufacturers are generally required to accurately identify their pipe both for internal record-keeping purposes, and for their customers. They are also required to mark these pipes with certain identification markings. This pipe mark provides identity and traceability for each pipe, thus enabling the manufacturer and the end-user to determine the manufacturing origin of the pipe.

Data that is generally marked on the outside of the pipe includes:
• Manufacturer
• Specification
• Compatible Standards
• Specified Dimensions
• Grade and Class
• Product Specification Level
• Process of Manufacture
• Test Pressure

To determine if the r/w was abandoned, you will need to do a property search at the local county assessor's office.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

write a letter of explanation/frustration to your governor's office.  Include your transcription of events and attach the recent letter of violation.  Explain just how illogical this "violation" appears for work that was done 35 years ago and your reluctance to pay a fine or take action to correct some perceived "defect" when conditons don't make sense.

You can worry about lawyers and regulations if you want to, but as a landowner, you deserve an explanation that you can understand.

Don't get defensive or frustrated, just remain calm and ask the governor's office for clarification.

It'll trickle down, but it'll have to pass through the DNR's cheif en route.

Just one way to approach this situation, which from reading this thread, doesn't make sense at all to me either!

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Concerning roadway abandonments:  I work for a DOT.  Typically when we abandon a roadway; we are in fact only abandoning maintenance.  The road will always still exist, but we no longer have any interest in it.  In my state, the local county commissioners are the governing body that can declare a road to no longer be a road.  Also, typically my state has a right of way but does not actually own the property fee simple.  You may want to check into the actual ownership and proper abandonment issues.  It may still be a road.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

True.  Even with no road surface left, the right-of-way and anything crossing it may still be technically subject to the same requirements.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

I would claim that I knew nothing about the installation of the culvert.  The fine is for "installation and maintenance of the culvert" and not ownership of an already installed in place culvert.  Leave it to them to prove you either installed it, maintained it, or even knew about it.  Unless they can prove that, you have not violated any ordinance.  

In this case passive acceptance means nothing as it would preclude that you knew about its existance and the laws and chose to leave it in place.  That would be very hard to prove in a court of law.  If there is a law requiring you to actively search and decomission all such culverts found, then doing nothing is passive acceptance.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

3feethighandrising, your arguement will not stand the light of day and is without merit according to Wisconsin case law. Read the case that was linked above.

"In the context of Wis. Stat. §30.123, "maintain" is not limited to actively performing maintenance but also includes
passively allowing the culvert to continue in existence."

http://dha.state.wi.us/home/Decisions/DNR/2002/3-NE-01-454.pdf

The case in this link is for exactly the same type of culvert situation.

Of course you can subcribe to the saying that lawyers sometimes use, don't tell me what the law is, tell me who the judge is.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
Bimr,
The culverts are buried. The only way to get the info you mentioned would be to dig up the culverts. Will this possibly result in another fine? Is there any other way to accurately age the pipes without digging them up.

I've read that the WDNR should work with the property owner to find reasonable oost effective solutions.In this case the first hint of a problem was the recept of a citation(s).

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

You may be able to resolve the problem without a fine or court case. Request a meeting with the DNR, state the circumstances of your case, and then request how you can resolve the issue. If you are not sure what they want you to do, request the DNR to put it in a letter to you.

My personal opinion is that I would not get an attorney involved unless I was going to court.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

and again, I say, "write a good letter to the governor's office."  You'll get your DNR meeting and the governor's office will know that it's taking place.

Not kidding.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

cooler heads prevail. I would not write any letters to the governor or hire an attorney until you have exhausted your efforts to try and work with DNR. Going over their heads will not make things go smoother for anybody. You need to show your good faith effort to work this out which by the way can work to your favor later on if you do go to court.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

To be guilty of "passive acceptance" they would have to prove that you knew of its existance before hand.  Without proving this, I don't see how they can prove you accepted the existance and functionality of the existing culvert.   Unless, of course, you are clearly benefitting from the use of the culvert (it is visible from your house or driveway).

In the previous case cited, the owner regularly used and benefited from the culvert (bridge) that was installed without a permit and the owner clearly knew of its existance, function, and condition.  The laws and statutes in the example referenced also refer to bridge structures (including culverts) over navigable waters.

I would reply to their $12,000 fine and letter stating that you did not know about the existance of the culvert, but you do now, and want to apply for the correct DNR permit to fill the entrance of the culvert in and abandon it in place.  Since you are now aware of the culvert, you are now required to take action.  Not doing so, would be passive acceptance.

Before contacting a lawyer, I would first see what DNR would require to abandon the culvert in place using the proper permit.  If they refuse to remove the fine, I would get legal counsel.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

"To be guilty of "passive acceptance" they would have to prove that you knew of its existance before hand."

Black's Law Dictionary 25 (8th ed. 2004), defines "acquiescence" as "[a] person's tacit or passive acceptance; implied consent to an act."  

Tacit or passive conduct that implies agreement or consent. For example, if one makes a statement and another is silent when an objection should be forthcoming, the second person's acquiescence to the statement may be inferred.


"If there is a law requiring you to actively search and decomission all such culverts found, then doing nothing is passive acceptance."

Generally speaking, ignorance of the law is no defense.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

..."They have you on the "maintain". It will not matter when it was built."...

Not a chance.  I don't live in WI, don't know a single law in WI.  But if what you say is true then that puts every single driveway, private road, commercial/industrial site etc. that has a stream crossing built before the law came into effect in violation and subject to such a fine or other legal action.

Are you really saying that?
 

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

I am not making up a legal argument. I am just reporting what happened in a similar case. Before you comment, thoroughly read the case.

"In the context of Wis. Stat. §30.123, "maintain" is not limited to actively performing maintenance but also includes passively allowing the culvert to continue in existence."

The quoted passage is copied straight from a similar case.

http://dha.state.wi.us/home/Decisions/DNR/2002/3-NE-01-454.pdf

If one "thinks" the law should be interpreted differently, one can always argue in court against the law. However, you end up paying your own legal fees to do it and it is usually not worth your while to pursue it.  In the US legal system for the majority of the cases, you will pay your own legal fees whether you win or lose a case.

You may even win in court. That is the basis of the attorney saying, "Don't tell me what the law is, tell me who the judge is."
 

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

OK, I read it.  Doesn't really change how I feel.  I think (uh-oh, here I go..) if the Millers had been able to show clearly the culverts pre-dated the law or even if it looked as such to the DNR then it never would have gone to court.  Just my opinion though.

But I do agree the OP would do well to heed the outcome of that case because it doesn't sound like he can prove his culvert was installed prior to the enactment of the law.

One thing I didn't catch though was how big the stream is that the culvert (culverts? is there multiple pipes crossing?) that started this thread is crossing.  DNR apparently said it is navigable, which doesn't seem to need to be too big or too deep to be claimed as navigable, but how big is it?

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
The statute does provide for exemptions, which I will argue made it unncessary to get a permit. The black pipes replaced culverts that were crushed by a loggers truck.These black pipes were placed 20-25 years ago WAG.I understand there is info on the pipe that will provide a date of manufacture.

I called and left a message with the DNR last week, no return call. I then e-mailed the DNR requesting a sit down, no reply yet. I did cc the Regional Director of the DNR as well as the governors office. My hearing is next Tuesday @ 1:30pm.

I feel pretty confident I'd win in court, but would prefer not to incur the expense.

The stream is not navigable by a common man's definition, but is according to the DNR'S definition.

Wish me luck.

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Good Luck!!

 

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

(OP)
HELP AGAIN. I have identified the manufacturer of pipe it's Prinsco Inc. out of Willmar Mn. To prove my innocence I must proof the date of manufacture. I cannot find a date anywhere on pipe. It says 18" heavy duty, there's some AAHSTO and ASTM marks but no date. I called Co, they aren't any help. Where would the date be? HELP. Court is fast approaching Please respond ASAP

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

from the yahoo search:

Prinsco - Manufacturers of GOLDFLO® and ECOFLO® HDPE ...
Prinsco, Inc. has been providing water management solutions for the agricultural, construction, golf, and landscaping industries since 1975.
www.prinsco.com - Cached

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Some plastic products have a series of imprints, circles with tick marks around them like a clock and an arrow pointing to one of the numbers.  The numbers are a code to the manufacture date.  I have no idea if these are found on plastic culverts, though. You would need to interpret the code, too, which might be tough if the manufacturer hasn't been of much help already.  

RE: $12,500 fine possible-placing culvert w/o a permit

Pipe may be indent printed with manufacturing and quality control information specific to the particular piece of pipe. This provides permanent identification and a direct reference link to all information concerning that pipe.

You have to contact Prinsco and ask how and if this is done. Some of the ASTM manufacturing standards call for pipe marking.

Form of markings are specified in AASHTO M 294.

http://www.ntpep.org/Documents/Technical_Committee/PIPE/706-NTPEP-Prinsco-48Sretest2-1105-summ.pdf

Prinsco should be able to assist you.

Manufacturer: Prinsco, Inc.
Corporate Address: PO Box 265
City: Prinsburg
State: MN Zip: 56281
Corporate Contact: Jeremy Duininck
Phone: 320-978-4116
Fax: 320-978-8602
E-mail: jduininck@prinsco.com

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources