We recently had a gravel material be tested by a soils lab for sieve and proctor. he sieve results classified it as "Poorly-graded gravel w/sand & silt", which does make sense once you compare the grain-size distribution. However, when they ran the proctor, they claimed they came up with an uncorrected value of 155.3 pcf. Now, I know that most engineers when designing with concrete usually take values from 145 pcf to 150 pcf. Looking at these results, I can't help but think that there may have been an error somewhere.
Has anyone ever encountered a material that the maximum dry density tests out heavier than concrete? Is this truly feasable?
Bear in mind this is 1/2" processed material, no reclaimed concrete or asphalt.
Extras: ASTM D1557 Method C for compaction. ASTM D422 for washed sieve was used.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
There has been a lot of buzz about MBSE because it can help companies develop concepts at the system architecture level and assess the performance of these concepts against requirements. Unfortunately, there has been a lot of confusion as well. Download Now