We recently had a gravel material be tested by a soils lab for sieve and proctor. he sieve results classified it as "Poorly-graded gravel w/sand & silt", which does make sense once you compare the grain-size distribution. However, when they ran the proctor, they claimed they came up with an uncorrected value of 155.3 pcf. Now, I know that most engineers when designing with concrete usually take values from 145 pcf to 150 pcf. Looking at these results, I can't help but think that there may have been an error somewhere.
Has anyone ever encountered a material that the maximum dry density tests out heavier than concrete? Is this truly feasable?
Bear in mind this is 1/2" processed material, no reclaimed concrete or asphalt.
Extras: ASTM D1557 Method C for compaction. ASTM D422 for washed sieve was used.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
There is proven benefit for product development teams in using an integrated design and data management system.
However, not all product teams can afford, need or want all the various modules in an enterprise PLM system.
Rapid prototyping has become a game-changing innovation for designers, engineers and manufacturers. Previously, the process of creating wood or metal prototypes took weeks or months and the cost was often so prohibitive that designers skipped prototypes entirely and went directly from CAD to tooling. Download Now