We recently had a gravel material be tested by a soils lab for sieve and proctor. he sieve results classified it as "Poorly-graded gravel w/sand & silt", which does make sense once you compare the grain-size distribution. However, when they ran the proctor, they claimed they came up with an uncorrected value of 155.3 pcf. Now, I know that most engineers when designing with concrete usually take values from 145 pcf to 150 pcf. Looking at these results, I can't help but think that there may have been an error somewhere.
Has anyone ever encountered a material that the maximum dry density tests out heavier than concrete? Is this truly feasable?
Bear in mind this is 1/2" processed material, no reclaimed concrete or asphalt.
Extras: ASTM D1557 Method C for compaction. ASTM D422 for washed sieve was used.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
3D printing has opened new doors to rapid prototyping and even rapid production, providing users with the unprecedented ability to visualize products before mass manufacturing and create new designs that could not be made by any other method. Download Now
Ensuring that product lifecycle stakeholders throughout your organization can access the most accurate, up-to-date product information will benefit all aspects of both the product and the organization itself. Download Now
Since the IEEE 802.3bj 100 Gb/s Backplane Ethernet standard has been officially approved, Channel Operating Margin (COM) will likely become an important quality-evaluation method for SERDES links. Download Now