×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard
2

Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

(OP)
Hi all,

I have been looking around on the forum and I wasn't able to find anything really definative to answer my question. I was curious if there is a type of setting or toggle I could change to show the Hole Wizard Size (Under Hole Specifications) as decimal instead of fractional. I know it is possible to create a hole wizard standard. But I am not sure if that is the route to take and or if that will give me the results I am looking for.

I am using Solid Works Premium 2010, SP4.0.

All help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks   

RE: Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

Ebroyles,
  Which part of the callout are you looking to get in decimal? Under your 'Hole Type' tab is the option to choose your standard. ISO and ANSI should be default options and your company may have created their own. Any of those three are most likely what you'd want your print to read being that it is what fabrication is used to seeing, however; there is a manual change.
  Hole Wizard drives the callout into the drw. If you dim the threading, shown as a hidden line, and leave it highlighted you can choose the 'other' tab (Located in your model tree) and check mark the 'override units' box and go from there.
  Per being able to visually see this callout in decimal vs fractional you may be out of luck. If it's a metric callout you want the first callout to be decimal and english to be fractional. That's standard to my understanding. Hope that helps.  

RE: Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

I have to ask.....  Why do you want to show that as decimal?

 

Anna Wood
Core i7 EE965, Nvidia Quadro 5000, 12 Gb RAM, OCZ Vertex 120 Gb SSD, Dell 3008WFP 30" Monitor
SW2011 SP0, Windows 7 x64
http://www.solidmuse.com
http://www.phxswug.com

RE: Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

(OP)
AnnaWood,

We have recently begun migration from NX5 to solid works. This is the system that everyone is accustom to. They would very much prefer to have the same setup. In NX you manually put in the correct decimal size compared to Standard drop down sizes that Solidworks offers. It is merely a preffered method because we callout our threading on drawings that way.

ex. .190-24UNC-2B

So it would be prefered to have the modeling side reflect the drawfting side.

RE: Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

Mr Ebroyles  I really disagree with your way of calling out threads. It's not either ansi or iso correct.Being a tool maker for more than 30 years, more than once that has bitten me in the butt. Especially on the small -6,-8,-10 tapped holes. The correct way to call out thds,where everyone can understand and not get confused, is  --
      Drill #7(.201) .50 dp
      Tap 1/4-20 UNC 2B .40 dp.
It seams you are trying to put the tapped hole size and actual tap size on the same line. Personally I feel this is a really Bad idea, especially if you ever go global. The foreign machine shops will laugh at you. And most likely get it wrong.

RE: Thread Callouts for Hole Wizard

(OP)
ArtL,

Actually this is a common practice. I used to work contractually for a billion dollar corporation that was global. This to was their prefered method as well. And it is hard to get a company of that size to change their methods. They to this day still call out threaded holes like that. So I find it hard to believe that it is wrong. It may not be the prefered method for yourself and or corporation. But it does work that way.

But I am not one to argue. you certainly have years more experiance then I. But this is the method they have chosen and I was only looking for a little advice.

e

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources