×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API fire testing for Metal Seated Ball valve

API fire testing for Metal Seated Ball valve

API fire testing for Metal Seated Ball valve

(OP)
We have our soft seated ball valves fire tested to API 607, which refers to fire testing for soft seated quarter turn valves. Is there a API standard for metal seated valves?

RE: API fire testing for Metal Seated Ball valve

It's been a while since I looked at the API standards, but if memory serves me, most people just use the API 607.  I think it's because the limiting component is usually not metal seat.

Patricia Lougheed

******

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: API fire testing for Metal Seated Ball valve

     Fire testing standards have had a turbulent history in the last years...: in 2005, API issued the 5th edition of its standard n° 607 as identical to ISO 10497 of 2004, which was applicable to industrial valves in general, even if API title mantained the reference to "Soft-seated Quarter-turn" ones (!); the 2010 editions, instead, differ in a few lesser details, but officially stand as two separated standards again (and API title changed into "Fire Test for Quarter-turn Valves and Valves Equipped with Nonmetallic Seats"... simple, isn't?).

     In my opinion, metal seated valves may be considered fire safe by design, provided that materials are properly selected, dimensions and tolerances correctly choosen and realized, etc... and the valve design itself is sufficiently proven-in-use.   
     But sometimes a test certificate is easier to obtain than Customers reasoning (about the above aspects); so, some Manufacturers applied the API "Soft-seated" procedure to metal seated valves too, perhaps complying with stricter acceptance criteria (no visible leakage before, during and after the fire, for example)...


Hope this helps,     'NGL
___________________________________


 

RE: API fire testing for Metal Seated Ball valve

When API 607 was revised and co-branded with ISO 10497, the reference to "soft seats" was removed from the title.  The ISO version of API 607 can be used for metal seats.  When the 6th edition of API 607 was released this year, it no longer is co-branded as an ISO standard and the term "soft seated" appears in the title again.  

So for metal seated valves, you can state they are naturally fire safe provided they don't contain any parts or seals that will melt at the test temperature, or when you get tired of explaining to inexperienced customers why you don't need to fire test metal seated valves, just test to ISO 10497.  It will be a long time before this standard ever gets revised.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources