×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

(OP)
I am designing a steel rafter (cold formed section SHS or RHS) to support roof loading with the worst case being about 10kpa upwards.

I have simply taken the contributing area for the line load on the rafter as 3.6m x 2.4m (room is 4.8x3.6m), rafter 3.6m long. So i have been conservative in taking the whole of the loading over the rafter but in fact the two walls that the rafter sit on are load bearing steel framed walls. I am thinking that these 2 walls may offer about 20 to 30% capacity to take the loads.

The design is not normal in that there is no roof space,ie, the roof panels sit directly on the walls.

How much can i downsize the rafter in taking the loading, is there a rule of thumb, a bending moment diagram for this?

Regards, Adam

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Are you sure the loading is 10kPa upwards, that is a very high uplift.

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Are you asking us to design the beam for you? Are you really a structural engineer?

This is not the place to ask such fundamental questions, you should have a senior engineer that can answer these things.

Also you seem to be making a lot of assumptions about the surrounding structure that may get you into trouble.

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

I agree with csd72 and kikflip...get some local help.  The sizing of a simply supported rafter doesn't depend on its support.

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Have to disagree here Ron...  He appears to be talking about is considered two way action.  In certain situations that can happen and help reduce sections.  

But, as others have indicated, you need the help of a structural engineer on this.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Hard to figure what adwinter is asking.  As kikflip says, 10 kPa is out of the range for uplift.  Maybe he means 10 kN/m on the beam, or about 4.2 kPa.  Still very high, but possible in cyclonic conditions.

The distribution of the loading on the beam depends on the type of structure bringing the load to the beam.  If joists spanning 2.4 metre as single spans, it is just based on the contributing area.  If joists which are continuous over the beam, the loading would be 25% greater.  If a solid two way spanning deck, the load on the beam would be trapezoidal, but again increased if there is continuity at the beam.  

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Mike...I must be having a senior moment 'cause I'm missing something...I don't see any two way action here, other than a simple load reversal.  

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Ron:

As Hokie alluded to, some framing systems allow for a trapezoidal loading shape to be applied to the framing (sloping load shepe atht ehends of the trapezoids).  This can reduce the shear some, but not much moment, usually.  It approaches two way, but is really not.  I too had a senior moment.  

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

Gotcha...didn't think of that.

RE: loading case for typical rafter sitting on two walls

I think a sketch of the structure would be in order.  I am not clear on the precise geometry of it.

BA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources