×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS
2

CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

(OP)
I'm designing some cantilever retaining walls where there is a slab on grade located on the heel side. This slab is a sidewalk for pedestrian use only, in fact no roads or driveways are located near these walls. I've looked at the IBC and it indicates for sidewalks to use a 250 psf live load surcharge. This values seems more likely for areas where heavy  trucks are in use. Should this value in fact be used, it seems a little too conservative? Any input is appreciated, thank you.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

Off the top of my head, that sounds like what I have used in the past for parking lots or areas that will have actual truck traffic. Probably what they are anticipating is occasional maintenance vehicles, as people can and will find ways of driving on sidewalks. But just common sensing this, what scenarios would result in a 200psf LL on a sidewalk (if you subtract 50 psf for the 4" slab weight)?? Will the sidewalk frequently handle participants on The Biggest Loser, or maybe an NFL team?

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

That is the same value the AASHTO Bridge Design Specification uses for highway surcharge loads on retaining walls. It states a min. of 2 feet of equivalent soil height shall be added and the min. weight of soil shall be 0.125 ksf.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

Are you required to design to IBC? Yes or no, case closed.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

The 250psf is in case cars and light trucks somehow end up on the sidewalk.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

250 psf is for sidewalks subject to trucking loads (straight from the IBC). If no trucks (especially fire trucks) can have access to drive on this- then I would consider using 100 psf surcharge (yard and terrance,pedestrian loading). If a fire truck could jump a curb and drive along the wall, then keep the 250 psf requirement.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

(OP)
Thanks all for the input, I appreciate it. I tend to agree with hawkaz and a2mfk. These sidewalks are located away from driveways or roads and are not very accessible to vehicles at all.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

When considering issues like the one you are, I always find that it's better to design for the additional load.... after all, accounting for the load now is easy as to trying to repair the wall in the future.

In the end, you may be adding a little extra steel in the stem and you may make the footing slightly larger.  As long as you are not talking about a 20' tall wall, the surcharge will not increase the sizes that much.  Account for the load and sleep better at night.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

Sometimes codes are the cart leading the horses . . .

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

Cap4000,
The current AASHTO LFRD Specification has two tables; one for traffic perp. to the wall and one for traffic parallel to traffic. The table in the FHWA reference appears to match the table in AASHTO for traffic perp. to the wall. In the AASHTO reference for walls parallel to traffic, it only requires 2 ft of additional soil for the surcharge as long as the load is at least 1' from the wall.

RE: CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLS

(OP)
SteelPE, very valid point of view, and I will consider this. Thanks for the link cap4000. Again Thank You All for your input, valuable indeed.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources