×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ARC Flash Boundary Requirements
2

ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

(OP)
This has been discussed in the past - but the threads are now closed.

We have many load centres (unit transformers) that have a HV switch with a dry type transformer and secondary distribution.  As we are all aware the secondary transformer bus to the main breaker has a high arc flash (typically).

The end result is that the arc flash boundaries are bigger than the switchroom spacing on a lot of the installations.

My question is: "If you are just passing through the room do you need to suit up in the required PPE, or just when "disturbing" the system?"

The reason I am asking is that the transformer ventilation makes the transformer "open" to the environment, and the passer by....

Thanks TULUM.

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

Wear suggested PPE when interacting/ disturbing the system. The Arc Flash boundaries for some switchgears can be 20 to 30 feet, you might even come across an adjacent panel board with just 5 to 10 feet of boundary. It's unlikely you will change to different PPE for every few feets of distance you walk in the room.

Wear atleast a cat.2 PPE when not intending to interact.

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

Well, this Arc-Flash situation is interesting. I think, at present, it only applies to plants in the USA. I can remember many installations (not in the USA) where everything electrical was in the same room:  34.5KV (SF6), 13.8KV, 6.9Kv and hundreds of 380V MCCs as well as relay panels, drives panels, etc. in one very large space. It was a chemical plant in the Middle East new in around 1997. (US designed).

If the Arc Flash rules have to be applied retroactively to existing older installations, that would be nearly impossible.
How would the operating staff have to Suit Up just to reset a relay or take a meter reading? That would be a walk-through situation I imagine.

Comments?

rasevskii

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

Depends up on what codes apply to you. In the USA, based on the current codes and practices, the answer is no. This does not prohibit people misinterpreting the intent of the standards and recommendations to the extreme.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

I would agree with Rafiq.  As long as you are just "passing by" and no switching or maintenance is being done, I don't interpret NFPA 70E as requiring arc-rated PPE.  Some companies have internal safety procedures that require PPE whenever entering an electrical room.  

 

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

The definition if "Arc flash hazard" is very clear in the 2009 70E, it only exist when "Interacting" with equipment. Now what "interaction" means is bebateable but it is not "just passing by" for sure.  

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

(OP)
Thanks folks.

The reason I asked is that it seems that

(a) because the definition for the flash protection boundary itself does not directly mention that you must interact with the system for the PPE to be required (in the standards but not in the definition), most people are under the assumption that as soon as you step into the boundary you require PPE regardless of interaction....

(b) With the louvers on the dry type enclosure, the bus would be considered "energized and not enclosed"?


 

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

2
NFPA 70E 130.3(B) says

Quote:

Where it has been determined that work will be performed within the Arc Flash Protection Boundary ...
The boundary applies when work is being performed.  PPE is required when within the boundary and when there is an arc flash hazard.  FPN No. 1 of the definition of arc flash hazard in Article 100 states

Quote:

An arc flash hazard may exist when energized electrical conductors or circuit parts are exposed or when they are within equipment in a guarded or enclosed condition, provided a person is interacting with the equipment in such a manner thay could cause an electric arc.
Walking through the area is not working or interacting with the equipment.

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

(OP)
Great thanks.

 

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

I can see both sides of this question. Most electrical failures result from human interaction or as a result of automatic operation of the equipment. As exemplified in the QM2 case, things do fail spontaneously, but that is relatively rare.

It comes down to practicality, company policies and insurance requirements. No code or standard can cover every situation. A little reasonable judgement needs to be applied. It may not make sense to require PPE just walking past a passive panel or switchboard. I would be less comfortable if there were active controls regularly operating circuit breakers, and less comfortable still if breakers or switches were being operated manually.

The national codes in the U.S. do not require PPE. Work practices are not within the scope of the NEC. NFPA 70E is not a code suitable for adoption by building authorities, but rather a standard practice. OSHA recognizes NFPA 70E as a standard for safe work practice, but does not directly enforce it.

Alan
"The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is." Unk.

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

The magic words are exposed energized parts, which doesn't apply if all of you covers and barriers are in place.

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

Quote:

The magic words are exposed energized parts, which doesn't apply if all of you covers and barriers are in place.
FPN No. 1 of NFPA 70E 130.7(C)(9) says in part

Quote:

The collective experience of the task group is that in most cases closed doors do not provide enough protection to eliminate the need for PPE for instances where the state of the equipment is known to readily change (e.g., doors open or closed, rack in or rack out).

RE: ARC Flash Boundary Requirements

Quote (alehman):

No code or standard can cover every situation. A little reasonable judgement needs to be applied.

I agree. NFPA helps you understand the hazards but it can't cover every possibility. In the end, it's up to the employers and employees to assess the risks and decide how to handle safety at their facility. I doubt OSHA will accept "we followed the standard" as an excuse if someone gets hurt.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources