×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Coefficient Analog for a Heat Exchanger

Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Coefficient Analog for a Heat Exchanger

Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Coefficient Analog for a Heat Exchanger

(OP)
I have a finned tube in tube heat exchanger for which we can measure various global parameters - hot and cold side pressure drop, hot and cold side delta T, hot and cold side mass flow for many combinations of running condition.

I'm trying to break the data down into an accurate assessment of the hot and cold side heat transfer coefficients.  One approach I'm considering is to use the Reynold's analogy between heat and momentum ie. Cf/2 = StPr^2/3.

My question is whether or not this method can be used with any real degree of certainty.  The pressure drops are not great (5 psid MAX) but we should be able to get a decent idea of the coefficient of friction if we run enough points.

Is this a reasonable approach?  (I've got another method but I'm wondering if the pressure drop data can be useful)

RE: Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Coefficient Analog for a Heat Exchanger

The only way I've seen dP used is as a rough indicator of flow (flow proportional to square root of change in dP).  which isn't to say your method won't work. why are you trying to measure h?

Patricia Lougheed

RE: Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Coefficient Analog for a Heat Exchanger

The heat transfer coefficient is dependent upon much more than the mass flow.  While your data may show a correlation, it is only because you have held other factors constant.  If you wish a model that is valid for varying rates of fouling (for one example) I would not suggest what I think you are proposing.

The more you learn, the less you are certain of.

RE: Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Coefficient Analog for a Heat Exchanger

The heat transfer coefficient is dependent upon much more than the mass flow.  While your data may show a correlation, it is only because you have held other factors constant.  If you wish a model that is valid for varying rates of fouling (for one example) I would not suggest what I think you are proposeing.

The more you learn, the less you are certain of.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources