×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Re: Electric Field Detectors, again

Re: Electric Field Detectors, again

Re: Electric Field Detectors, again

(OP)
Referring to my previous question (Thread238-22832) on voltage detectors vs. electric field detectors, I finally found what I was looking for.

An electric field detector for use of utility personnel to alarm them in case of inadvertently energized equipment was produced by Avo, the Megger Osprey LA501 (for distribution level voltages) and the LA502 (for transmission level voltages). It is now available from Osprey Limited (UK) and is called the Live Alarm 5060D (distribution networks), 5060T (transmission systems) and 1625-R (for 16.6 and 25Hz railway systems).

MY QUESTION:
Does anyone have experience with using any of these devices, especially as an additional safeguard for distribution linesmen? How reliable were they? Were there so many false alarms from surrounding sources that linesmen did not use them? Were they able to survive field working conditions? Did you have to get the manufacturer to adjust their sensitivity?

THANK YOU FOR ANY FEEDBACK.

RE: Re: Electric Field Detectors, again

Suggestion. It will be better to visit
http://www.avointl.com/
for their literature and recommendations since the safety is involved.

RE: Re: Electric Field Detectors, again

An added phrase to the OP’s definition of "inadvertently energized" may be “not recognized to be..." or "not safely determined to be deenergized.”

It seems like the differences in “voltage detectors vs. electric field detectors” may be marketing or regional terminology; both seemingly based on the generally accepted concept of non-contact AC-voltage detection.  Non-contact AC-voltage detectors have an effective and proven operating history for a decade or more, but like any safety appliance require formal training and extensive, intimate, end-user field experience to be effective—particularly for false-positive readings and the ability to treasonably determine the {admittedly sometimes subtle} differences in indication and sensitivity.  Because of the extreme variability in real conditions, assignment of a hard number {id est, "V/m" capability} may be viewed as purely bureaucratic, and entirely “CYA” to some mid-level administrator that is virtually clueless about the device’s operation and limitations, short of some printed text he may have reviewed.

In no case are non-contact testers intended to be used by less than fully trained/qualified field personnel.  A critical part of that craft training is clear and demonstrated recognition of tool limitations, especially where it becomes a daily, root life-or-death issue.  

Increase in user safety far offsets occasional non-productive or delaying false indications, that should be clearly understood and anticipated.   A user should employ another method in its place, or use alongside another method wherein that person has established confidence in whatever other device; otherwise the worker should be barred from the immediate task at hand and limited to lesser duties for the sake of themselves, their peers and families.  The no-questions, “never candy-assed here” “tough dude” stance should have been gone well before the turn of the century.  
  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources