×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

(OP)
Hello everyone,
I've cross-posted this from the IBC (Building Officials) forum.

I've been pushed (once again) by our local concrete contractor to allow a basement wall to be built according to IBC minimums (Tables 1805.1(1) through 1805.5 (5).
1805.5 states that the tables may be used when the top and bottom of the wall is laterally supported.  
With a building 80 feet long, 30 feet deep and a walk-out basement, I say the floor does not constitute "lateral support" but would love to find a definitive code reference.
Is there an IBC white paper or something that anyone is aware of.  I'm tired of having this argument!

Thanks all.  

RE: IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

You might take a "quick" look at designing a floor diaphragm that would (might) work - along with all the connections, fasteners, blocking, etc.  Once they get past about 2:1 - seems rather dubious.  I have done a few and they get impossible pretty quick.

Once he sees what it takes - I think he might listen.   

RE: IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

(OP)
Thanks Mike,
Wood diaphragms get really gnarly if you reduce the diaphragm capacity by .56 for permanent loads per footnote "h" of the 2006 IBC diaphragm tables.

I'm still looking for a reference that might define "lateral support" as a 'diaphragm of adequate strength' or some such thing so I can point to it in the code.

My client (architect) understands what I'm telling him, but his client (owner) wants to believe the concrete contractor because the walls are cheaper to build.

RE: IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

Another thing you'd probably want to check is horizontal deflection of your diaphragm in the middle of the 80ft span, and is that compatible with your concrete wall... You may not want an inch of deflection at the top of your basement wall from a sustained load, for example.

RE: IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

If he's a concrete contractor, design a concrete floor for him to build.  That will brace the wall.

RE: IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

Or...  You might make the diaphragm work laterally if you added an interior concrete shear wall amd drag link to limit the ratio to 2:1 or less.

If there's a pill, there's a way.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

(OP)
Thanks for the response.  I guess my question wasn't totally clear - its more of a code interpretation question.
By making the use of the prescriptive tables dependent on having "lateral support" at the top and bottom of the walls, without specifying what constitutes "lateral support", its open to interpretation by anyone - including non-engineers.  Then the non-engineers want to argue the point again and again.
It would be great if the ICC has issued a "Technical Opinion" on this to shut down the argument right from the start.  Anybody a member of ICC that could check?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources