×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dropping Pipe Hydrotest to Suit Vessel

Dropping Pipe Hydrotest to Suit Vessel

Dropping Pipe Hydrotest to Suit Vessel

(OP)
I have a vessel which cannot be isolated from the piping since the vessel nozzles have welded connections in stead of flanged connections. After a modification to the piping which increases the minimum required hydrotest the following becomes pertinent:

Reading B31.3 345.4 carefully seems to indicate that I can't reduce the hydrotest pressure (As per 345.4.2 (b)) to cater for yielding components (As per 345.4.2(c)) and then on top of it drop the hydrotest pressure further to allow combined pressure testing with a vessel (As per 345.4.3 (b)). This is due to the fact that 345.4.3(b) refers specifically to 345.4.2 (b) and makes no mention of 345.4.2 (c).

Is this view too obtuse? Or is this actually the intent of the code?

RE: Dropping Pipe Hydrotest to Suit Vessel

Hydrotesting is specifically the main reason why there are flanges on tanks and vessels.

Insert flanges on your nozzels. Blank the new flanges. Test the tank in accordance with the code of record. Test the piping in accordance with B31.3

   

RE: Dropping Pipe Hydrotest to Suit Vessel

A couple options to consider:

1)  Hydrotest pipe and vessel to 1.3x MAWP x ratio of stresses if applicable, to suit the vessel, and as owner, call that good enough.

2)  Hydrotest pipe and vessel together to 1.3x MAWP, then if it can be done safely, pneumatically test both to 1.1x MAWP without the ratio of stresses.  After a 1.3x hydrotest, this should be safe for both, correct?

3)  If 1) or 2) is not an option, do 1) and then do additional inspections (sensitive leakage testing, full radiography etc.) to further assure yourself.

This of course assumes that flanges were deleted for good reasons.  If so, clearly putting flanges back in solely to serve the needs of the test would be a bad idea!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources