×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Scour - shocking results

Scour - shocking results

Scour - shocking results

(OP)
The bridge has overbank flow forced back in the river channel by the bridge approach embankments. Based on the Live-bed scour in the contracted bridge opening, the maximum scour depth is ... 15 feet.

The D50 is 1.5 mm and the flow rate is almost 10,000 fps passing through an opening of 100 feet.

I know that the equation is conservative according to some reference (Richardson and Davis, 1995) because it assumes a long contraction where uniform flow can develop. I just think that this maximum scour depth is not... reasonable.

Something I should do before sending the results to the Structural Engineer?

RE: Scour - shocking results

You might consider double checking your calculations. Is that really 10,000 fps (6,800 miles per hour) that you refer to?

RE: Scour - shocking results

Ditto, bimr.

RE: Scour - shocking results

(OP)
Sorry! 10,000 cfs hehe

RE: Scour - shocking results

Sorry, 15 ft of live bed scour is not a lot. Monitoring after the storm won't help you to see that, either, because the scour will be filled back in. Your velocity with 10,000 cfs through 100 ft opening is going to be huge. With a 10 ft depth the average would be 10 fps, so significantly higher in the center of the channel. When I saw this thread title I thought "Oh, I bet someone has calculated an embankment scour of 100 ft."  

RE: Scour - shocking results

(OP)
The bridge is cutting a floodplain and there's a significant increase of velocity between the approach and the bridge.

I just thought it was overly conservative but you bring good point by saying that the scour will be filled back in.

I'm just keeping it back before sending it to Structural Engineer. I know that he never faced something like this before.

100 feet!

RE: Scour - shocking results

an experienced bridge designer certainly will not flinch at 15 feet of scour. However, in order to protect the banks and the abutment you will need to spend considerable money in channel improvements. It might be worthwhile to make the bridge opening a little wider than 100 feet. I would suggest you work with the designer, not hold anything back.

RE: Scour - shocking results

Another scour source you need to think about is the long term impact that your bridge will have on the riverine system.  You may want look into a sediment transport model pre and post structure.

RE: Scour - shocking results

Live bed implies that the scour occurs on the up leg of the flood hydrograph and sediment is deposited again on the down leg. The sediment that is re-deposited is non-structural, so scour protection needs to extend beyond the depth. There is a simple check to see if live bed or clear water scour is likely. Aesthetically, live bed looks better, but structurally they're the same.

The embankment scour equations are outrageously conservative. Here we specify embankment scour protection (very successful) and ignore the scour data for embankment scour. Pier and contraction scour we take very seriously, and we assume channel migration and armor piers the same on the overbanks as the channel.

We also have strict rules regarding how much backwater is allowable: 0.14 ft is allowable without having to purchase flood easements. I would expect substantial backwater from cramming 10,000 cfs through a 100-ft wide opening... not to mention the 500-year storm.  

RE: Scour - shocking results

(OP)
Thanks, for the information.

We do ignore embankment scour as well.

Just to mention: that flow rate of 10,000 fps is the 500-year storm (well 1.7 x 100-year).

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources