Seismological event
Seismological event
(OP)
Yesterday at about 7.05 MDT USGS telemetry data of sismographs all over the world showed an event that affected many sismographs all over the world, say 7.05 in Alaska, Beijing, Japan and Australia... what kind of event may cause such thing? Are there precedents?
The link is from a speculative site but the USGS seismoragph charts are not and you can follow the progress by links therein.
Furthermore ir looks as if some weaker repeater has appeared at about 1.00 MDT.
http://ww w.godlikep roductions .com/forum 1/message1 240786/pg1
The link is from a speculative site but the USGS seismoragph charts are not and you can follow the progress by links therein.
Furthermore ir looks as if some weaker repeater has appeared at about 1.00 MDT.
http://ww





RE: Seismological event
ht
Check whether that's MDT or MST. A few minutes before 7:05 AM Mountain STANDARD time on November 2, there was a 4.1, also in Mexico.
ht
I didn't feel like watching much of your video, but it didn't look like anything out of the ordinary.
RE: Seismological event
Something is happening... But time only will tell what. Just be prepared.
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto: KISS
Motivation: Don't ask
RE: Seismological event
The question is that the people in that forum seemed to think that almost at the same time the rings sounded it was thought in good part of USA and then by examination of other records, as well in many other parts of the world. Of course seismographs will register what happens at every moment where they are placed but the simultaneity on the noticeable events was startling. As stated above the phenomena seems not to have receded entirely, and I remain curious about what maybe the case. Here you have two sites with the named seismograms still showing at the moment weird simultaneity of the events irrespective of that the magnitude is much significative or not from the designers' viewpoint.
http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.shtml
htt
Yesterday (today already off-the chart) the simultaneity was clearer and the seismograms less populated. Maybe it is visible in the former links.
And the interesting point is (if there's any significance to the thing) what causes the simultaneity worldwide.
RE: Seismological event
P-wave velocity in the earth's mantle is over 10 km/sec (LA to NY in half of a second), so, for example, the 4.1 in Chiapas would be picked up at the various recording stations in the northern US very nearly simultaneously. (The velocity is much lower in the crust.)
The Tucson and Albuquerque traces are almost identical, because they are so close together (500 km).
Remember that the squiggles you see are extremely small ground accelerations.
RE: Seismological event
RE: Seismological event
RE: Seismological event
RE: Seismological event