×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Stiffener Spacing for a rectangular conduit

Stiffener Spacing for a rectangular conduit

Stiffener Spacing for a rectangular conduit

(OP)
One steel conduit for carrying water under pressure needs to be designed. It is a box section of say 4m X 6m. The box will be made by say 20mm thick steel plates and the box will be stiffened by regularly placed stiffners on outer surface (circumferencial). Stiffeners will be flats of about 16mm thick plates. My confusion is about the spacing of the stiffeners. What is the width of 20 thk plate which I can take as coacting width to make a T section with the 16 thk stiffener?
Please advise.

RE: Stiffener Spacing for a rectangular conduit

Flame,

I would have expected your local steel structures code to tell you that.

In Australia there are two codes.

Our Allowable Stress code (AS 3990) allows you to consider up to 560/sqr(Fy) * thickness to be the effective width of a plate supported on both edges by stiffeners.  (Fy in MPa), so you get about 35 * thickness for basic mild steel with Fy=250 MPa, less with higher quality steel.

Our Limit State code (AS 4100) is a little more stringent, and specifies thickness*30*sqr(250/Fy).

If your local codes do not have any relevant provision, you should be OK with stiffener spacing up to 600mm (and your nominated 20mm plate), and taking the total section as fully effective.

RE: Stiffener Spacing for a rectangular conduit

(OP)
Austims, Thanks for your comments.

Our code (Indian IS:800) in same and specifies 256T/sqrt(Fy) to a maximum of 16T as width to be considered on either side of the web.

The client's remark suggest us to take 0.11*(span of the tee section, 4000mm here) to be used as co-acting width based on another code that deals with hydraulic gate (stiffened plate for holding water behind it). While this 0.11*span figure is indeed there in that code, I have no clue to its basis or its applicability on other similar structures. It feels like I will have to be content with the value as suggested by you and fight it out.
Regards,
flame

RE: Stiffener Spacing for a rectangular conduit

flame.

That criterion of 0.11*span sounds rather like a provision to account for 'shear lag'.  There could be a justification for listening to your client.  

I would be quite surprised if it makes any practical difference to your design whether you take an effective  width of plate of 440 or 600.  Either way, the maximum stress will be in the stiffener outstand, and it will probably not be affected greatly by reducing the effective width to that extent.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources