Perpendicularity measuring
Perpendicularity measuring
(OP)
How to measure the perpendicualrity on this part, its a standard of ISO 2768, thanks for all inputs.
SeasonLee
SeasonLee
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
Perpendicularity measuring
|
Perpendicularity measuringPerpendicularity measuring(OP)
How to measure the perpendicualrity on this part, its a standard of ISO 2768, thanks for all inputs.
SeasonLee Red Flag SubmittedThank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. Reply To This ThreadPosting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! |
ResourcesThe world has changed considerably since the 1980s, when CAD first started displacing drafting tables. Download Now
Prototyping has always been a critical part of product development. Download Now
As the cloud is increasingly adopted for product development, questions remain as to just how cloud software tools compare to on-premise solutions. Download Now
Engineering-centric businesses face a number of challenges today, but unmanageable design and change processes don’t need to be counted among them. Download Now
|
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Chris
SolidWorks 10 SP4.0
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
The print is ISO standard, the standard of ISO 2768 is a general tolerances for linear measures,its better to revise my post to : the tolerance standard is ISO 2768.
SeasonLee
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Frank
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
They Show Datums and features to centerline. Also it mentioned if datum precedence is not Important Both datum Names A & B can be Given in Same Box !
NX 6.0.2.8 MP4
Teamcenter 2007
WINDOWS XP (64 Bit)
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Thanks for info.
I dont have ISO 1101 (2004).
But atleast now i am aware that ISO and ASME are almost similer. :)
Is there any PDF or Document which shows the differnce between ISO 1101 (2004) and ASME y14.5 M 1994 .
Thanks in advance.
*Problem is in our Organization many dwgs are based on old ISO standards.Now we are Updated it to ASME Y14.5 (1994).
But lot of confusion with people regarding the Symbol and representation of GD&T .
Initially i Thought most of old dwgs are wrong regarding GD&T. But recently i got hold of this old ISO PDF then realised dwgs are alright , i am Wrong :)
NX 6.0.2.8 MP4
Teamcenter 2007
WINDOWS XP (64 Bit)
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
you are correct there is much confusion and apathy
J-P,
I read it no different than "A-B".
Frank
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
I thought the same, until I pulled out the ISO standard. The 1983 version explicitly says that "AB" means that the "sequence of two or more datums is not important." There is a separate blurb explaining the different "A-B" as a common or combined datum.
This was even more confusing because ASME allows "AB" if all single letters of the alphabet are exhausted (other than I,O,Q). But apparently the old ISO standard didn't have any provision for identifying datums beyond single letters. Shrug.
John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Agreed, I see that they have both in '83 as you've stated. I suspect that it was a case of oversimplification and someone realized that on a large part theoretically they may actually reach datum "AB". Naturally the choice of actual datums "A" & "B" will have an effect on that what was intended if they were two concentric features on a shaft/boreline I suspect it was the same thing, probably to carry over from a earlier practice.
I believe I have seen engine blocks with an awful lot of datums; I used to work in the automotive/heavy machines industry and saw many engine block prints.
I wish I had easy access to the up to date ISO standards as you apparently do. I do have old and new books on the standard though, naturally they will suffer from the same issue we all have here, even with the large volume of our version: "what does it mean", ISO 1101 gives less direction than ASME.
Frank
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Thanks dgallup.
Its a good idea, will try to section halfway so that I can use datum feature A and B to setup the DRF.
SeasonLee
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
If our CMM didn't have that command, I would take two diameter measurements; one near bottom of cone, and one near top of cone. The center points of the two diameters would then be used to create a cone C/L, and could then be evaluated.
If I didn't have a CMM, I would use two different diameter ball bearings. The two ball bearings would tell us angle, breakout dia and C/L perpendicular.
Harold G. Morgan
CATIA, QA, CNC & CMM Programmer
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Thanks Harold
Would you mind to give us more detailed information on the last method-two different diameter ball bearing.
SeasonLee
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Adding to or clarifying what JP posted above, ISO now prohibits the appending of datum callouts, fcfs and such to centerlines (as ASME suggested in the first place). Also, ISO 2768 is primarily a size-tolerance standard based on limits & fits essentially. There is some guidance for what it means for orientation, etc., but it's rubbish.
Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Small ball is 3mm, Large ball is 10mm.
Using surface table, height gage with scribe, and knee block: measure position of both balls in all 3 axis.
The measurement results and trig will show condition for perp, angle, and cone position.
Harold G. Morgan
CATIA, QA, CNC & CMM Programmer
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Prohibits is pretty strong language for a standard? I would imagine it is not retroactive?
Frank
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Thanks again,Harold.
The picture is pretty clear, and the method is very practical, its really give me a great help, I am trying to give a second star but limited by the system. Anyway, thanks for all inputs.
nithinku
Here is the thread of GD&T differences between ISO and ASME.
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=228088
SeasonLee
RE: Perpendicularity measuring
Good point, it is not retroactive as each standard is accompanied by a release date, just like Y14.5; it can be Y14.5M-1994 or Y14.5-2009 or ...
Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com