×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Footings & Load Factors

Footings & Load Factors

Footings & Load Factors

(OP)
I seem to come across an issue a lot that I don't know what to do with.

Often when checking bearing pressure under service loads I have no uplift across the footing.  As soon as I factor my loads though I do get uplift.

In other words, the load factors change the structural support.  The concrete design loads are now based on a an altered support condition influenced by load factors.  This doesn't seem like a realistic approach to me.  Any comments or thoughts?

RE: Footings & Load Factors

arent factored loads only for strength design of footing and not for stability check.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

For simplicity I always use ASD load combinations for footing stability and bearing pressure checks.  For the design of the reinforcing, I then use a load factor of 1.6 on the bearing pressure.  This should prevent the phenomenon you are describing.

Adam Vakiener, P.E.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

I've run into this a couple of times.  I've typically only run into this if you are just barely inside the kern for 0.6D + W (it will kick you outside the kern for 0.9D + 1.6W), or if you have very little compression for 0.6D + W (0.9D + W could give you a very little amount of uplift).  I'll typically try taking advantage of a little more DL when this comes up (soil over the footing comes to mind as a nice one) to get it to work out.  

RE: Footings & Load Factors

(OP)
AVak,

That approach seems a little conservative, but reasonable to me.  Any other ideas anyone?

RE: Footings & Load Factors

where did you get the 1.6?

i encountered a similar thing about tension load.
load combination was allowable.
tension reaction was say 20 kips.
another engineer's calcs, he multipied the tension to 1.6 to make it ultimate or factored.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

The problem is that you have nonlinear relationships between load and stresses in some cases.  I had assumed that the whole point of LRFD was to accomplish the effect which you're describing.  Specifically, have the safety factors on the load, rather than on the final stresses.  However, as was pointed out to me sometime back, if you look at the definition of the loads, D is the "dead loads OR related internal moments and forces" and depending on which side of that "or" you use, it gives you two different approaches and two different results.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

(OP)
JStephen,

That summarizes my question very well.  Am I after the factored loads, or the factored load effects?

RE: Footings & Load Factors

and they say that by integrating LRFD into geotechnical engineering, we get a more consistent and understandable and elegant solution . . . ha !

RE: Footings & Load Factors

You're after the factored load effects, in my opinion.  I believe this is clear in the DAM in steel and it makes sense that approach is consistent with the intent of the code.  Even in ACI, the moment magnification is based on the factored moment and axial load and is not factoring the manificarion based on a service moment and axial load.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

What is a manificarion, you ask?! Good question. It's apparently iphone's correction for magnification.  

 

RE: Footings & Load Factors

And herein lies the contradiction with using factored loads.  In some cases, like steel, it doesn't appear to matter whether one factors the load or the load effect.  In others, like soil, it does matter.  (I think it matters with concrete, too.)  To be consistent, the whole theory should have been based on factored load effects, not factored loads.  I propose a whole new system, LEFRD.  Pull out your credit cards.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

I think it does matter whether you factor the loads before the analysis or factor the load effects after the analysis.  This is only true where second order effects are considered.  The reason is that the second order effects are larger for the factored loads, so the effects are greater than a similar analysis carried out with service loads and then factored at the end (you're not taking into account the additional second order effects - additional lateral drift from the factored lateral loads * the higher, factored gravity loads).  This is the reason that the DAM requires, even if you're using ASD, to factor the loads to do the analysis, then divide the final load effects by the load factor - to ensure that the second order analysis analysis results are consistent no matter which approach you use.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

There have been occasions where I had to make a footing a little bigger, because it worked for bearing pressure under 0.6D + W, but the load resultant was off the footing for 0.9D + 1.6W.

And I don't agree with simply multiplying unfactored bearing pressure by 1.6.  This can be unconservative sometimes.

DaveAtkins

RE: Footings & Load Factors

(OP)
Thinking about it a little more... the 1.6 factor doesn't solve this problem does it.

RE: Footings & Load Factors

(OP)
Thinking about it a little more... the 1.6 factor doesn't solve this problem does it.

Also, you couldn't be looking for the factored load effects because you'd have a different support condition for dead, live, wind, etc. and you can't just find the effects of each one and add them together.  You have to combine the loads somehow before you find the load effects.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources