I am trying to get feedback from the wider industry on the basis/philosophy considered/used for establishing the leakage rate back through check valves in view of calcualting required relief valve size to protect the upstream section the check valve is leaking into, this is specifically the case where two check are provided in series and one is considered to have completely failed and the other has a leakage rate based on for example a) ?? percentage of forward flow or b) ?? fraction of check valve rim face or area or c) any other basis.
I am sure many design and operating companies follow varying philosophy, if you can help and share your experience and company standard and / or point me in a direction of a guidance document or paper you may know of such as a international standard. Thank you all in advance for any guidance you can afford.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
There is proven benefit for product development teams in using an integrated design and data management system.
However, not all product teams can afford, need or want all the various modules in an enterprise PLM system.
Rapid prototyping has become a game-changing innovation for designers, engineers and manufacturers. Previously, the process of creating wood or metal prototypes took weeks or months and the cost was often so prohibitive that designers skipped prototypes entirely and went directly from CAD to tooling. Download Now