×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 650 Bottom plate testing

API 650 Bottom plate testing

API 650 Bottom plate testing

(OP)
I need to Know if it is necessary to re do hydro test after repairing a weld where water leaked during the hydro test.
Is it possible to apply vacuum test in the affected area as defined by chapter 7 point 7.3.3 instead of the hydro test.
 

RE: API 650 Bottom plate testing

Since the hydro is primarily to test the shell, I would not think a repeat hydro is required after bottom repairs as long as the bottom repairs pass per 7.3.3 (which should have been the way the bottom was originally tested).  Were the bottom seams lap type tested per 7.3.3?

RE: API 650 Bottom plate testing

Doing a vacuum test ensures the weld is leak tight for the vacuum it does not subject the weld to the static head and hence the pressure loading. What if the original failure was due to flexing of the base due to poor sub-surface preparation. Doing a Vacuum test will not guarantee when you fill the tank again that the loading will not cause a weld fracture. Are you willing to chance the next fill to be the Product?  

RE: API 650 Bottom plate testing

Typically, if the leak(s) have been easily identified by Vac-Boxing, the Inspector will only require a Vac-Box or Dye Penetrant (PT) test of the repair(s).  On the other hand, if the leaks were of an 'odd' nature and not easily identified weld defects, or were difficult to locate, the next thing I would do is to PT the welds on the entire floor, and the corner-weld to the shell.  Using water-washable dye and a wet-vac to pick up the mess, this can be done in one day.

Last resort is a rehydro.  That test is, as IFRS said, to stress-test the shell.  It shouldn't be required to find floor flaws.  Did you witness the initial vac-boxing of floor?*  It is time-consuming and is brutally hard work.  Portions of the floor may have been missed.

*  It is hard to expect 100% coverage if we are unwilling to participate, or witness testing.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources