×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tubesheet Design

Tubesheet Design

Tubesheet Design

(OP)
Early appology if this has been discussed before; I did several searches but was unable to find anything relevant.

We have a customer who currently owns a shell & tube heat exchanger (TEMA NEN); he uses it more as a reactor vessel than a heat exchanger.  He is looking to have his existing unit modified.

Currently it has 1-1/8" OD tubes.  The owner wants new tube sheets and baffles installed, but he wants to use several different size tubes, ranging from 3/4" OD to 2" OD, with mostly 1" OD tubes (total of five different sizes).  All sizes are standard condenser tube sizes.

Background: Design will be to Section VIII, Division I, unit will carry NBBI R stamp.

Just wanted to get some additional thoughts on how to go about calculating an appropriate tubesheet thickness.  The existing unit was designed to Ed '04, A'05, and we know what the existing thickness is.  We don't know what the tube-tubesheet attachment is, but we plan on double serrating every tube hole, and expanding and seal welding every tube.

-TJ Orlowski

RE: Tubesheet Design

TJOrlowski, short answer is this will be a U-2(g) design, perhaps by FEA. I am not familiar with any standard tubesheet calculation that accounts for multiple tube diameters, and current Part UHX calculations are pretty resticted as to scope. I don't suppose you have access to the originals?

I think you are going to have to get an early buy-in from the AI for whatever you propose to do as well.

Tough problem:)

Regards,

Mike

RE: Tubesheet Design

As an afterthought, I suppose you could do the calculations for each tube diameter as though only that diameter were present, and take the thickest result, although for a fixed tubesheet exchanger this is a gross simplification. Reliability would be very dubious.

Regards,

Mike  

RE: Tubesheet Design

(OP)

Quote:

do the calculations for each tube diameter as though only that diameter were present, and take the thickest result,

This will most likely be our initial approach.  Each ligament will be greater than or equal to the ligament that would be present if all the tubes were the same (ie the ligament of any 2" tube hole would be .482 in any direction, even if all surrounding tube holes are smaller).

I plan on doing UHX calcs and wiping the dust off the TEMA calcs as well; luckily our AI remembers the couple of times that ASME scratched what they had come up with and told S&T fabricators to refer back to TEMA.

Thanks for the input.

-TJ Orlowski

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources