×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Composite beam in STAAD

Composite beam in STAAD

Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Hi,
I am trying to model a composite beam (steel beam + concrete slab).
For this purpose I modeled my composite beam as a steel beam and plate elements.
I applied then an offset distance 0.95 m to the steel beams.
Now I see that the steel beam gets a very large axial force and the Mz moment at the mid span is very small!!!
I am really confused the way STAAD calculates section forces.
Do you have any clarification on this?
Do you have any sample for a composite beam used in STAAD (built-in Composite Deck)? Could this feature used on user defined beams such TAPERED?
I have uploaded my input file.

Thank you
Bill
 

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Instead of modeling a beam with plate elements, check the help file index for Composite Beams.

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Thanks for your hint, but what do you think about the section force computed by STAAD?
 
I mean small bending moment and large axial force.
Unfortunately, I don't have any other software to verify the results.
Suppose this is a bridge deck, what shall we do if the section forces are not correct.
Steel beams fail when I apply a check code due to large axial forces.
It doesn't make sense at all.
Does STAAD calculate the section forces correctly?
Do you know how I can get arround this situation?
Thanks
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

It sounds like you may be modeling a floor with plate elements and these elements are loading the beams up with axial loads. Instead of plates, consider using the master-slave spec to model a rigid diaphragm.

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

The axial stress is the result from the negative temperature load. Your model has a concrete beam floating in space that should be deleted and a steel tapered beam. The composite beam design works with standard shapes not tapered beams.

The slave master commands only apply to a floor diaphragm.
 

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Thanks SteveGregory,
I don't know how I can make a rigid floor diaphragm.
Just wonder if you mind helping me on this?
Again thanks a lot.
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Do you want to design a single beam or a whole floor of beams?  The only purpose of modeling a rigid diaphragm is to distribute lateral loads for a whole floor to your lateral load resisting system.

If this is a single beam, I suggest hand calculations.

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Thanks again SteveGregory,
Do you know how I can get rid of the axial force in the beam?
I have used the EXPLICIT definition method in STAAD to create a composite beam (CM.std)
The steel beam and concrete slab act monolithically and as expected for load case 1, max Mz=5000 kNm, but it doesn't work for the temperature load (Shrinkage).

How can I get around this problem so that I get Mz=5000 kNm in my previous model?
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Call tech support

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

I have used STAADPRO to model composite steel girders with concrete deck bridges and I have found best results are with slab modelled as elements and girders as tapered steel beams. I have used concrete beams to connect the centroid of deck to the centroid of the girder with dimensions of this beam to be the width of top flange of girder and depth equal space of element.

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Hi edward1,
Thanks for your reply.
I am glad to hear that you have successfully modeled a composite beam in STAAD. I was about to give it up and try other software for this problem.
Have you applied MEMEBER OFFSET command to steel girders?
I have done the same, but the max mid span moment is not correct due to huge axial force in the girders!
Could you please if possible upload your model so that I can see what you have done to overcome this problem?

Thanks
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Bill,
 The model you have is correct. If you look at the bottom flange stresses in the girder they will be close to the bottom flange stresses of a composite beam design such as Digital Canal's Composite Beam Design. You probably need this type program which calculates more details about the composite beam design than STAADPRO.
Ed      

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
edward1,
Thanks for your help indeed.
I must try this software.
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Bill,
 I stumbled on the way to keep axial forces low using MEMBER OFFSET to model composite beams. You need to model the slab in the XY plane with the beams offset using LOCAL command. Be sure to use the correct BETA angle for the right beam orientation. All gravity loads will be in the Z direction.
Edward   

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

I have included a model of a curved girder composite steel bridge that was also run on MDX with very close results. Notice the MEMBER OFFSETS and BETA angle used. This bridge was constructed in 2006 and was fitted with instruments to get natural frequencies and stresses from test trucks.  

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
edward1
Thanks for your reply and please fogive me if I am late in responding you.
I am not sure if one can specify the member offset distance in conjunction with the beta command. Please see attached pictutre.

LOCAL means that the distances f1, f2, f3 are in the same member coordinate system that would result if the member were not offset and BETA = 0.0
What that means is that when you specify a LOCAL offset, the program is applying those offset values to the unrotated position of the member (BETA=0 position).
What do you think?
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
edward1
Thanks for your help!
I did the same to my model. All axial forces are gone now. Could you please take a look at my modified model see if you find any irregularities in my modified model.
Please not that I used PERFORM ROTATION X 90 to rotate my original model, then I specified the offset distance as shown below:

MEMBER OFFSET
1 TO 20 START LOCAL 0 -0.7 0
1 TO 20 END LOCAL 0 -0.7 0
The BETA is specified as 90 (BETA 90)
Thanks again.
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Bill,
 Just change the support at joint 105 to 21.
Ed

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Ed,
Thanks for your help.
Could you please say why I have to change the support?
Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

(OP)
Ed,
Thanks for your helps!
I don't know why we should model the structutre this way.
Don't you think this is a limitation in STAAD?
When you use Digital Canal Composite Beam, do you also get so large axial forces in the girders?
BTW I see you are an advanced user of STAAD using REPEAT in your input file.

Bill

RE: Composite beam in STAAD

Bill,
 I agree that this is a stretch for STAAD. The Digital Canal Composite Beam program is much easier for this problem.
Ed

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources