×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

modal analysis, shell vs solid

modal analysis, shell vs solid

modal analysis, shell vs solid

(OP)
Hi all,

i'm performing a modal analysis on a piping system. i discovered that natural frequency values change if i use shell elements instead of solid.
Is this possible?
I checked everything: from material used, till constrain and contacts.

First prototype built (shell elements used), had problem of resonance even if the value of the natural frequencies for pipes were far away from excitation of the force, calculation tell me 35.8 Hz while force is near 47Hz.

Just for curiosity i changed my model using solid elements for the pipes instead if shell, and i discovered that the pipes have a frequency in the field of the frequency of the force, 45.8Hz.

the only thing i see different is that while with shell elements bonded contact are generated between edge, with solid elements i'm supposed to put contact between faces arising the whole stiffness, is this thought correct or should i look for other reasons?

thanks in advance
 

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

the simple answers is yes there is a significant difference, it has to do with the shell elements being more flexible

more specific answers will require response from those more involved with the calculation methods.

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

Off the top of my head, I think there is an aspect ration that you have to follow which is thickness to length.  If the aspect ratio is small you go with shell, if large, you go with solid.  You can also do some hand calculations to find out what the Fn is for a long pipe and see which one correlates better.  FEM is GIGO, you have to correlate to somthing to make FEM valid.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."  

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

If you use a coarse mesh then the model tends to be stiffer and hence produces a higher frequency. If you've used solid elements then my guess is that you have too few through the thickness and the model is tending to be over stiff.

Tata  

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

(OP)
Hi all, thanks for the answers, you clarify me one face of the problem.

Yes, solid element size is about 3mm along thickness of the pipe that is 0,7mm: so this lead to say that the resonance value i calculated is more probably a coincidence.
Furthermore the ratio thickness by lenght is about 0.7/500 minimum. So shell elements seem to remain the correct one to use.

But nothing about contact? i mean, don't they play a relevant role on FEM analysis?

thanks again for your support
 

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

What about element size?  Keep reducing element size until the numbers stop changing.  Too coarse of a mesh can produce erroneous results, whether solid or shell.

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

"But nothing about contact? "

Contact between what?  different parts?  Are you saying you have contact between the surface of the pipe and some other part?  If so, how specifically have you modelled it?
 

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

Solid mesh is definitely on the coarse side, even if you're using P-tets.  What software are you using?  Does it have automatic mesh refinement?  (Likely not available for modal analysis, anyhow.)

Any idiot can finish a test if he's not worried about getting right answers.  More time processing is the least of your worries if your results aren't right.

Run again with a mesh refined by a factor of about 1.5.  If your results are comparable, you're OK.  If not, keep refining.

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

Contact doesn't apply in modal analyses as you're just obtaining the 'characteristic' modal shapes and not specific displacements. You'd need to run a full dynamic analysis with prescribed loads/displacements if you wanted to include contact.

If you're only interested in the pipes then why have the rest of the structure there as relatively speaking it must be fairly rigid compared to the pipes and could be replaced by imposing fixed restraints, perhaps?

Tata  

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

I do agree with corus for modal analysis, however, once you do a vibration analysis, I find that having a contact fixed in direction, but free to rotate (even though you think it should be fixed in dir and rotation) is more realistic.  


"so this lead to say that the resonance value i calculated is more probably a coincidence."


I'll have more faith in hand calcs than the FEA. IMHO, FEA are the pretty pics you show to management to communicate what you calculated by hand.  Don't become complacent with FEA, if you can not do the hand calcs, you shouldn't do the FEA.  In any case, you should have a good idea what the frequencies and mode shape (stress, strain, deflections...etc) should be before you do the FEA.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."  

RE: modal analysis, shell vs solid

Actualy let me take that back on the modal analysis (sorry corus).  I find that if your cantacts are fixed in directiona and rotation, you will get higher Fn, and if contacts were fixed in direction and free in rotation, you will get lower Fn.  From test data I have done in the past (such as covers on a electronic box that is fastened on all four sides), I find that fixed direction and free rotation is more realistic.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources