×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Question on Wood Diaphragm

Question on Wood Diaphragm

Question on Wood Diaphragm

(OP)
I've come to the conclusion that there is no way I have time to study anything for the PE in less than three weeks and now I'm scrambling just to get codes tabbed.

In doing some tabbing, I noticed that the wood chapter of IBC talks about cantilevering a wood diaphragm.  It gives the parameters under which this is acceptable, but lists it under RIGID diaphragms.  I haven't done a great deal of wood design, but I've always thought that wood diaphragms were always considered flexible?  Does this cantilevered wood diaphragm really require it to be rigid and needs to be confirmed per the rigid/flexible criteria in IBC?

RE: Question on Wood Diaphragm

The diaphragm must be considered rigid; otherwise you don't have rigid body rotation that would allow the two perpendicular shearwalls to contribute to lateral stability.

Plywood is really semi-rigid in that you are allowed to consider it flexible for most situations. But it really is rigid enough to to act as a cantilevered diaphragm.

 

RE: Question on Wood Diaphragm

(OP)
If it's a flexible diaphragm and it has two walls parallel to the load it's still stable, right?

RE: Question on Wood Diaphragm

No..  that is equivalent to a pin-free beam..  

It has to be rigid in order to rotate..  it's the rotation that enables the two perpendicular shearwalls to be engaged.

btw..  up until a year and a half ago, I was under the exact same impression as you..  The only reason I know otherwise is that shortly after I was laid off, I had an interview with a company and I was given an impromptu oral technical exam..  This came up..  not really a good time to learn something new..

RE: Question on Wood Diaphragm

frv:

What SEIT says is correct - read it again.   

The rotation comes in where you have three walls, two transverse to the load, and one not asligned with the center of gravity of the building, inducing an inherent  torsional force.   

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Question on Wood Diaphragm

Yep..  you're right.. I misread it..  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources