×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

STL, STEP, or IGES
2

STL, STEP, or IGES

STL, STEP, or IGES

(OP)
Does anyone have any comments as to which file type is the best generic CAD format for use with SolidWorks 2009 or 2010?

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

My first choice would be parasolid, but you don't give it as an option.  Of the ones you list, my best results tend to come from STEP, followed by IGES if I had to.  I won't use STL except for rapid prototyping applications - the facetization of originally smooth faces isn't generally appropriate to my work.

A lot depends on what's on the other end of the generic transfer - what format does your downstream program expect/prefer (or what does your upstream program do well at exporting)?

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

First - Parasolid (*.x_t or *.x_b) (the kernal SWX uses)
Second - ACIS (*.sat)
Third - STEP (either version)
Fourth - IGES (*.igs)

As Steve said, STL is only for sending directly to a rapid prototyping machine and even then I would send a parasolid.  All of the RP machines I know of can use the smooth dumb solids listed above and the RP operator would rather have those files so they can control the tessellation of the STL files themselves.

- - -Updraft

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

Quote:

...generic CAD format....

I consider Parasolid and ACIS to be "proprietary neutrals" while STEP and IGES are truelly neutral.  

I would vote STEP.  Be aware that IGES can be solids or surfaces - Option for solids output where appropriate. Also note that Autodesk products pre 2011 cannot open an ACIS later than ver 7 (while current ACIS is something like 17 or 18 or perhaps later - haven't used an ACIS in a while)

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

Of course if you only concern is backwards compatibility with older SWx then use Parasolid.

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

Stupid question...What's the real difference between a parasolid and STEP file. They're both one solid model when imported, right? Then run Featureworks against the Solid to make an usable SW part.

Best,

Colin Fitzpatrick (aka Macduff)
Mechanical Designer
Solidworks 2010 SP 3.1
Dell 490 XP Pro SP 2
Xeon CPU 3.00 GHz 3.00 GB of RAM
nVida Quadro FX 3450 512 MB
3D Connexion-SpaceExplorer

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

Quote:

Stupid question...What's the real difference between a parasolid and STEP file.

I would certainly hope the geometry is the same.
Would double check any complex stuff like Loft, Dome, Freeform, Deform, Flex.....

A parasolid binary format would probably be the smallest file size.

RE: STL, STEP, or IGES

Quote:

What's the real difference between a parasolid and STEP file.

As rollupswx mentioned, parasolid is "proprietary neutral." STEP is a ISO standard for neutral files, while IGES is a ANSI (or ASME?) standard.

Joe
SW Office 2008 SP5.0
P4 3.0Ghz 3GB
ATI FireGL X1

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources