×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FD vs FSD

FD vs FSD

FD vs FSD

(OP)
I've been taught to use a rule of thumb of calling for fire dampers in ductwork penetrating walls with a 1-hr fire rating; and calling for combination fire-smoke dampers in ductwork penetrating walls with a 2-hr fire rating.

The problem is that I have no idea where this rule of thumb came from. Has anyone else encountered this? Or better yet, know where this comes from?

RE: FD vs FSD

It comes from code.

Here, International Mechancial Code IMC 2009 Section 607 rules.  NFPA 90A-19 Figure A.5.3 is a nice pictoral, but doesnt include all updated building code requirements.

 

knowledge is power

RE: FD vs FSD

(OP)
Thanks for the response cdxx139. Reading through those codes are actually what brought me here to ask the question.

There is no code or standard where it is simply laid out saying a 1hr wall requires FD and a 2hr wall requires FSD. Am I wrong in believing that the rule of thumb is flawed? And yet, it seems to be very popular.

RE: FD vs FSD

Ive never heard of your rule of thumb, but like all rules of thumbs, it will get you by 80% of the time, but when it comes to life safety, do the research.  Its an expensive add once everything is built.  

As for the other 20%...in some cases, if it is a one hour partition, but the duct is just running through the space and does not have an opening to the space, then you dont need a fire damper.

Now you need a combination smoke fire damper any time you come out of a shaft.  There ia an exception that allows a stainless steel subduct to exempt the fire damper, and if the unit runs 24/7, then you can exempt the smoke damper.

Codes are not written to be quick rules of thumbs, because then how would they fill in the 6" binders they come in?  They are written to be difficult to read, so the Authority Having Jurisdiction can interpret it how he sees fit on that day.  (I've been burnt in the past)

knowledge is power

RE: FD vs FSD

Requirement is application specific, so one size fits all does not work well. For wet labs under NFPA 45, no dampers are to be installed (subducting required). Size of penetration would also be a consideration. Whether the damper is intended for smoke compartmentalization under NFPA 92A or B would be another consideration.

RE: FD vs FSD

As an example - In LA County the AHJ will only want to see CSFD's.  Refer your local AHJ on the matter, they don't bite, and often enjoy having someone ask ahead of time rather than fight them on the completed plans.
  

RE: FD vs FSD

As the name says (Fire/Smoke damper) goes in a smoke partition that is fire rated.
Also needed in RA at each floor at RA shaft.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources