×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Structure change due to overheating
2

Structure change due to overheating

Structure change due to overheating

(OP)
Hi guys,

just got asked whether accidental local overheating and quick cooling of pipe can change the structure to martensite, I said probably not, but my question to you guys is...

What are the conditions ( if any ) that could possibly change a structure ( lets just assume A106 gr.B) from pearlitic to bainitic or martensitic. I am familiar with T-T-T diagrams, but not in reverse. I would imagine the material still needs to go above 800C before any change is likely....

Declan

RE: Structure change due to overheating

Here is the quick checklist-

Alloy
Time at temperature
temperature
heat extraction rate

 I worked at a company that made thin walled tubes (.018") out of 4140. Out process was to drop them into a furnace at 1600F and quench them 5 minutes later - fully martensitic.

RE: Structure change due to overheating

The bottom line is this, what was the maximum temperature and time of exposure? If the temperature was below either the lower critical transformation temperature or original tempering temperature (if applicable), nothing would happen.

If the maximum temperature exceeded either of the two critical temperatures above, you have an altered material.

RE: Structure change due to overheating

The question is probably has the pipe really changed to martensite or just embrittled possibly hydrogen, heavy metal or carbon contamination. Are the operators just guessing?   

RE: Structure change due to overheating

(OP)
Cloa,

that is correct, they just want to be sure its not martensitic, and I'm fairly sure its not. I would be very surprised if the temperature reached the A3 temp.

When the material is originally formed, if it is quenched from austenite fast enough to avoid the pearlite transformation, giving you a martensitic structure (ok so I am simplfying this slightly). Would there be no change if you reheat the material(as pearlite) to just below the A3, and then quench it, would some martensite form, or would you just get larger, harder pearlite grains?

Declan

RE: Structure change due to overheating

In the case of overheating a formed part, the analysis gets more complicated.  For a short term overheat of a thick part, the degree of overheat depends on positon thru the wall thickness, and type of new crystal formed is depenednet on the rate of cool down, which also varies as a function of position thru the wall thickness.

Also, in addition to crystal structure, there are also strenght enhancing strace metlas that are added to the original melt- the hi temp creep strength is dependent on an equal distribution of these trace metals thru the material. A short term overheat could allow some of these trace metals to come out of solution and agglomerate- so even if teh corect crystal structure is formed, the lack of evenly distributed trace metals will lower the long term creep srength.

RE: Structure change due to overheating

(OP)
Thanks Dave,

just to qualify this better. The pipe is std wall X55 gas pipe, , creep resistance is not a consideration, it is not in any kind of dynamic environment, except for pressure drops and increases, max operating pressure of approx 45Bar.


Declan

RE: Structure change due to overheating

If you did not exceed the lower critical transformation temperature there would be no martensite formation. If the material was originally Q&T, you will further temper the material if you exceed the original tempering temperature.

RE: Structure change due to overheating

deco0408,
How did the overheating occur? Did someone try to heat straighten the pipe; with a rosebud or better yet with oxy-acetylene torch? If so, you can almost be guaranteed that the lower critical temperature was exceeded. Did they water quench on one side after heating?

RE: Structure change due to overheating

A test that is somewhat less than a proper microstructural analysis is the old fashioned hammer test.  Even though various methods exist to examine an actual sample of the affected material it is still very common to test any steel that had been overheated with this test.  I've tested pot still distillation columns, heating fluid lines, boiler tubes using this test.
One thing this type testing enables is the ability to cover wide areas of affected material.  A case in point is some heating media vapor lines exposed to flames due to firemen knocking off the asbestos insulation so they could keep the lines cool we were able to safely bring the lines backup very quickly to mitigate further loss.
This type physical testing is not for every case but can be assistance in some cases but is not a substitute for a formal metallurgical analysis.  

Please don't hammer test anything pressurized as I have found some very brittle material using this method.  

RE: Structure change due to overheating

unklesyd:

What is the hammer test and if it is just impacting the pipe what are you expecting as a result?

Dik

RE: Structure change due to overheating

The nomenclature isn't exactly correct but you will hear the term burnt metal used with hammer testing.  If there is been any transformation of the metal it have very low ductility and in some cases will not deform and actually chip out when struck. The test isn't absolute unless the material breaks when struck.  I was taught to especially check around welds or any place where there was any signs of the metal yielding.  
I haven't use the test on process materials since 1989 but have used it when flame straightening structural steel where it would take more than one heating cycle to straighten the section.
A little history on hammer testing.  When I first started work it was quite common to hammer test a new fabrication when hydrotesting. Again it was mostly in the area of any welding or the weld proper.  You always wanted to have a little deformation of the area struck.
I should have stated that with the portable equipment available the hammer test has been retired, but you have to remember that it was used for years in the day of Acetylene Welding, Twin Arc Weld and sometimes material with a shaky pedigree.  

 

RE: Structure change due to overheating

If it is a vital part, you can have the structure tested through a replica, or perhaps ultrasonic hardness testing will tell you what you need to know.

RE: Structure change due to overheating

Can I throw a related question in here?  When a steel shaft heats up enough to turn blue can you assume that something has happened to the steel?  The steel in this case is Stressproof.

RE: Structure change due to overheating

Please follow site rules and start a new post.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources