×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

(OP)
Hello.  I'm new here and I'm hoping you guys can help me out a bit.  My name is Ian and I'm getting into the business of importing Chinese 2 post car lifts into the U.S. and though I have an engineering degree I'm mostly a business man.  So here's my issue.  Attached you'll find a photo of a lifting foot on a car lift.  I imported this lift for testing and when I tested the lift to it's max capacity I noticed that the foot deflected downward enough to make the powder coating pop off the side of the foot.  While it did not exhibit permanent deformation it did deflect enough under the load to cause suspicion.  So, I have asked the factory in China to propose a way to strengthen this piece.  Their reply was to replace the existing Q235 steel with Q345, which they claim is nearly twice as strong.  My problem is that I cannot find anything on the web showing the mechanical properties of these  two Chinese steels to verify that this is indeed a good decision.  Can anyone help with firm information on these two steels?  I thank all those in advance who can and do help.

Ian Gilmore

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

Q235 material is in accordance with PRC standard GB 700 and Q345 is in accordance with GB 1591. I have translated copies of these standards but they may be out of date now.

According to my documents:

The min. yield point of Q235 is 235 MPa for thicknesses < 17mm, 225 MPa for 16-40mm, 215 MPa for 40-60mm, 205 MPa for 60-100mm, 195 MPa for 100-150mm, and 185 MPa for >150mm. The tensile strength is 375-500 MPa.

The min. yield point of Q345 is 345 MPa for thicknesses < 17mm, 325 MPa for 16-35mm, 295 MPa for 35-50mm, and 275 MPa for 50-100mm. Tensile strength 470-630 MPa.

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

(OP)
Excellent, so this means the Q345 is a ballpark average of around 50% stronger.  I'm ok with that.  The Q235 did the job so I can live with this Q345 then.  Thanks!

Ian

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

Ian,

If deflection is the source of your problem, a higher strength steel will not fix it.  You will need to add stiffness to the piece to limit the deflection.  It could also be just a bad paint job.

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

(OP)
I don't really know that I agree sme75, in the past when I've had similar deflection problems switching to a higher strength steel has solved the problem without additional bracing.

Ian

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

The Q345 is stronger as bones206 noted. That means that it has a higher yield stress and higher tensile strength. Its stiffness (Young's modulus) should be about the same as the Q235 however.

Since you mentioned that there is no permanent deformation at the maximum load then the elastic strains might be what's causing the powder coating to pop off, and these will be the same for the 2 steels.

Also, the location of the peel is not where I expect the highest stresses and strains to be located, so it may be something else! Paint peels off for several reasons, and stress/strain is only one of them.

Nagi Elabbasi
Veryst Engineering
 

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

How does the Modulus of Elasticity compare for the two steels?  Probably about the same.

The paint did not peel off in a high stress area, so bad paint job sounds more likely.

BA

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

(OP)
I too am now very curious how the two modulus' compare.

Ian

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

Ian:
I agree with BA's last post, and would add that if paint were going to be cracking and chipping due to high stresses it would be at the welds joining the plate (foot) to the steel tube section.  That welding and area is the area to watch.  There really isn't any appreciable stress at the point the paint bubble failed.  If you loaded the rubber pad on its near edge in the photo, over the paint bubble, rather than fairly uniformly over its whole area, you could get some torsional stresses where the paint failed.  But, I doubt that they would be a likely failure mechanism.

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

(OP)
I follow you dhengr.  I drew attention to the powder coating popping off because this happened right as the lift attempted to lift this heavy load at that moment.  I still wish someone knew the two modulus of elasticities of the two metals.

Ian

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

I don't think the Young's modulus will differ much from that of other mild steels (29,000-30,000 ksi). There are also different 4 grades of Q235 and 5 grades of Q345 which have varying carbon content.

The PRC Steel Design Code GB 50009 uses a value of E = 206,000 MPa (29,877,774 psi).

Perhaps the steel mill in China could provide you with some more specific material data.

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

If (and that is a big if) the paint spall is stress related, it implies that the round black foot was loaded eccentrically and there are larger strains in the steel at the sides of the hole for the foot.

 

RE: Q235 vs Q345 Strength?

Just another voice...the modulus of elasticity will be the same.  If there was no permanent set, the deflection was elastic and will be the same with the different steel.  Perhaps powder coating, at least this process, is not the right system to use.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources