×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

HEC-RAS Bridge Modeling question ....

HEC-RAS Bridge Modeling question ....

HEC-RAS Bridge Modeling question ....

(OP)
I'm working on a project at the junction of two large rivers (30,800 CFS).  There are multiple existing bridges over each of the two rivers (all bridges are skewed, 2 are at 40-degrees).  My question is how should I model the bridges?  The Section lengths are much longer/larger than the bridges.  
1. Do I revise my HEC-RAS Section so that it is perpendicular to flow at the bridges and adjust the bridge dimensions accordingly?  If so, how should I show my analysis Section on the drawing?
  .... or .....
2. Should I simply use the "Skew Bridge" command from the Bridge Editor?  Would this option affect the entire Section length (i.e., beyond the bridge extents)?

All responses/advice/opinions appreciated.  Thanks.

RE: HEC-RAS Bridge Modeling question ....

I typically cut my xsecs in accordance with the flow direction and model the bridge as if it were perp.  I have tried the parallel to bridge approach w/skew but typically revert back to the perp condition.

I am not sure there is a correct answer both are accepted in my area.

RE: HEC-RAS Bridge Modeling question ....

The skew function in HEC-RAS reduces the horizontal distance by the cosine of the skew angle. It is calibrated for up to 30 degrees. I have used it for up to 40 degrees on narrow flood plains with flows under 10,000 cfs.

The problem with excessive skews is that you have one side of the flood plain outside the contraction reach while the other side is already going through the bridge. The local hydraulics would be best modeled in a 2D model.

On a river of the size you're dealing with, with several existing bridges, is there not an existing FEMA model? It would at least let you calibrate your existing conditions model.

I have one rather delightful project where I'm modeling a bridge at 45 degree skew where there is road overflow at the 10-year flow condition and the entire road is under water in the 100-year condition. My "skew" through the "bridge" section varies from 45 degrees to 80 degrees and the point at which overflow occurs is really three cross-sections downstream.

The modeling approach was discussed with the reviewing agency before I cut my cross-sections. I didn't use the HEC-RAS skew function, I used a spreadsheet to adjust the horizontal distance by the skew at that part of the cross-section. In other words, I manually projected a perpendicular cross-section at the bridge. The rest of the cross-sections were cut perpendicular. Strictly speaking, my internal "bridge" cross-sections crossed these, but there was no other way to model the road overflow.

Without road overflow, most of the cross-section is inside the ineffective areas and the only part that matters is right near the opening.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources