×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Structural Software Comparison

Structural Software Comparison

Structural Software Comparison

(OP)
I work for a engineering company that does relatively light calcs and would like to find software that fits our engineering needs without breaking the budget.  We mainly work with simply supported beams/columns and in some cases 3 or 4 support continuous beams and small frames.  We work mainly with cold formed steel and hot rolled steel.  Most of the shapes we analyze cannot be found in AISI or AISC shape database therefore we would like to find software that not only can build a shape but can also input that shape as a beam/column or as a member in a frame.  

Any suggestions would be much appreciated.  Right now the leading contenders are Enercalc and RISA.  We have a copy of RISA 3D and found that it is useful for complex structures but calc presentation is time consuming to filter through.

-Engineer Soto     

RE: Structural Software Comparison

I use RISA 3D and mTab-Stress w/ FeMap pre/post processor. Very pleased with RISA and their tech support is excellent.

Have used Algor, STAAD, and STAAD-Pro...

You'll get a variety of opinions here...most of them very valid for a variety of reasons...much of which is personal preference.

RE: Structural Software Comparison

I'm a fan of RAM Elements.  It has a pretty wide range f custom sections available.  Does Enercalc allow input of frame members?  Also, Enercalc is very user friendly, but does have a lot of issues.

RE: Structural Software Comparison

I use Risa 3D and have for years.  Works well for me.  Just have to be selective with the output.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Structural Software Comparison

Have used Digital Canal products and am very pleased.  Not for the huge robust stadium roof projects, but for less complex projects, they work well and are relatively inexpensive.  They have a product which works within AutoCAD (Frame Analysis) and a standalone (VersFrame), as well as modules for timber, concrete, and footer designs.  Also have utilities which analyze non-tabulated shapes--built ups plate and angle girders for example.   www.digitalcanal.com

RE: Structural Software Comparison

I use HP 11c calculator.  I used to use a slide rule, but have moved on.

BA

RE: Structural Software Comparison

(OP)
Thanks for all the input.  I will get back to all of you once I complete my purchase.   

RE: Structural Software Comparison

For quick but robust answers on simpler beam loading problems, I have found www.soft4structures.com to be a useful online tool.  You do have to pay a modest subscription fee for the full version, but I have analyzed indeterminate beams and trusses successfully with it.

For large quantities of similar beams in a structure, I have also had success with using spreadsheets...just be very careful in your forumlations - garbage in, garbage out.
 

RE: Structural Software Comparison

Tedds by CSC may be useful for most of the calcs you are referring to but not for frame analysis.  

EIT

RE: Structural Software Comparison

I like the Visual Analysis programs by IES. They have several products that cover a wide range of needs. VA does not do everything, it will never replace SAP or GT Strudl, but I don't need that. I find it easy to use, affordable and the staff is very supportive and helpful.

RE: Structural Software Comparison

I second DRC1's recommendation for VA.  As a user for almost 6 years, it does 90% or so of what I need on a daily basis, including cold formed.  For more complex structures, we use SAP or ETABS.  Also, the sales and technical support from IES is second to none, in my opinion.

If you visit the website (www.iesweb.com/downloads/index.htm) you can download a 30-day trial that is not "locked down" as some other vendors I have tried.

JWB

RE: Structural Software Comparison

RISA is great for what you describe.  Plus it is very quick and very easy.  

Try this: To reduce output, you can highlight only the relevant members, joints, etc. and hit the "exclude" button on the left.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources