×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

LTC for paralleled transformers

LTC for paralleled transformers

LTC for paralleled transformers

(OP)
Is a load-tap-changer (LTC) required for all paralleled transformers?  If so, why?  If not, what are the circumstances that one will not be required?

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

If the transformers have the same voltage ratings and can be place on the same tap, there is no need for an LTC.  This assumes two transformers in the same location.  

You just need the effective turns ratios to be the same, regardless of how you get there.

But to equally share load, the two transformers need to have the same impedance.   

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

In the unlikely event that two transformers have the same pu impedances but unequal X:R ratios, They will still share the load but the total current may be a little less than the arithmetic sum of the individual currents.
If one transformer of a paralleled set has an OLTC then the second transformer should have an OLTC slaved to the first OLTC. Different taps mean different turns ratio and that results in circulating currents.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

(OP)
So, basically, if the transformers have the same characteristics (voltage rating, impedance, X:R ratio, etc.) and placed on the same tap then a LTC is not required.  Otherwise, circulating currents and unequal load sharing will result.  Is this correct?

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

Unequal impedances result in disproportionate load sharing. Different turns ratios resulting from unmatched tap settings causes circulating currents.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

As Bill said, if the transformers have different impedances, they will not share load equally, regardless of LTC or not.   

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

Perhaps my understanding of the question is different from the others, but I don't see that paralleled transformers affect the need for LTCs. LTCs or regulators are needed when voltage will unacceptable for the loading conditions otherwise. The choice of regulators versus LTCs is an economic one. If LTC transformers or regulators are paralleled, they must have controls set up for this to avoid recessive circulating current. Everything you will ever need to know about it can be found at beckwithelectric.com.

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

(OP)
Typically, power transformers are paralleled because the load growth has exceeded the capacity of the existing transformer and the age of the transformer precludes scrapping or relocating them and purchasing a new larger one.  With that said, is a LTC only necessary if the existing transformer has a LTC?  Or maybe a better question would be, what are the scenarios in which a LTC is required?

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

Try taking a look at this,

http://www.beckwithelectric.com/docs/tech-papers/advxpara.pdf

I did some control and wiring work on several transformers using the Beckwith controls last year, this paper provided some answers I couldn't get from the people I was working with, hope it helps you too.

Mike L.

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

If your existing transformer has an active LTC and you are going to parallel a new transformer with that, I would think you would want an LTC to control circulating currents between the units.  This is one scenario where I would think it would be required.

If the LTC is inactive and thus remains on the same tap all the time, then I wouldn't think that the second would need an LTC.  However I would probably still opt for one.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it is broken, fix it.  If it isn't broken, I'll soon fix that.

RE: LTC for paralleled transformers

How did the word recessive get in my post above? Excessive was what I meant to say.

No, it is not required. You could lock off the existing LTC and go unregulated. You could install (a) regulator(s) beyond the interconnection point (LTC still locked off). Or you could pair the new transformer with a regulator so the transformer regulator pair is paralleled with the LTC transformer. Matching impedances and ratios might be tricky for the last choice. I would opt for an LTC transformer closely matched in ratio, impedance, no of steps, and voltage per step.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources