×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pneumatic testing

Pneumatic testing

Pneumatic testing

(OP)
When doing a pneumatic test, what is the purpose of doing the leak test at test pressure and then dropping the pressure down to design pressure and doing another leak test. One would think that if the piping system held at the higher test pressure that dropping down to design pressure and leak testing again would be redundant. This is typically what engineers call for. Any thoughts?

RE: Pneumatic testing

I can think of two reasons:
1. When you pressure to test pressure some structural distortion may occur which may affect the test at design pressure.
2. Some systems are designed such that the pressure assist the sealing, therefore, in lower pressure the leak may be higher than at higher pressure.

RE: Pneumatic testing

Misguided procedure to keep from killing Inspectors.  Pneumatics are usually lethal, it a major failure occurs while you are inspecting properly [closely].  First you pressurize to Test Press, and hold 10 minutes [while hiding behind somethisn sturdy.  *Then* you bleed the pressure down to Design, and start 'soaping' the welds.  Additionally, I resoap at 10 to 20-psi, after Design Press.  Reason is that I have seen small, round holes that would blow the test solution away and never form a bubble at Design Press, but would bubble nicely at 10-20 psi.

RE: Pneumatic testing

Downhand,

I'm not sure what Code or Standard you are testing to.
ASME B31.3 clearly states the procedure under 345.5. I see where it addresses achieving the test pressure incrementally and holding to relieve the stresses and strains at each increment.
Then reduce to design, "before" examining for leakage.
Pneumatic testing harnesses a tremendous stored energy that just doesn't release like a pinhole in a pipe being hydro tested. It reaps havoc.
If the redundancy saves lives (Even One!), its well worth the effort.
 

" There is no Shortcut to anyplace worth going "

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources