×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Protection System Scheme Testing

Protection System Scheme Testing

Protection System Scheme Testing

(OP)
I am curious about how folks in the utility world view this.  We are a commissioning company and prefer to test for realistic scenarios.  Our test protocol (on this job) calls for very simplistic tests.

I feel like we are forced to comply with test specifications that require light bulbs and a flick on an analog meter - and the test is complete.

We have nice test equipment that can easily test a full scheme (inject fault and monitor relay, communications, breaker / reclose, etc).

Our customer seems to think that it is not necessary.

Any comments?

RE: Protection System Scheme Testing

We also expect our technications to do an initial scheme test to prove the wiring, relay logic, and show the cables to the breakers is in tact.

Relay tests are not enough. A whole scheme test is necessary. We also test CT's and PT's, as well as all communications paths to the remote ends.

We have from time to time done a syncronized test of protective relays at both ends of transmission lines to find timeing problems with seprate schemes.

Go the extra step. It shows up in reliability.

RE: Protection System Scheme Testing

In the evnet of a serious incident e.g. switchgear failure resulting in death the coroner in Australia would start by having the integrity of the switchgear investigated.  Includes how it was tested.  The client should be made aware of the hazards of not performing a thorough test of the whole system.

RE: Protection System Scheme Testing

From the power generation world I'd be looking for as complete a test as possible, especially on awkward stuff like transformer and generator differential schemes. Ideally a primary injection test initially, then secondary injection for each function.

Coming from an O&M background I probably have a different opinion to many EPC outfits who want the job signed off and handed over to the client while incurring the bare minimum cost and time delay. No offence intended to the good EPC guys who do the job properly. smile
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: Protection System Scheme Testing

Normally I would specify the following tests:

1) Functional test, including checking of all mech, key and elec interlocks

2) CT Polarity Test (Flick Test)

3) Primary Current Injection Testing (Include CT Ratio check)

4) VT Ratio check

5) Secondary Injection Testing

6) Hi voltage di-electric test (Flash Test)

7) IR / Megger Test

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources