×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

(OP)
For a threaded anchor rod in tension, embedded in concrete, ACI 318 Appendix D gives methods to check the steel anchor failure as well as various concrete failures (breakout, etc.).  

But is it necessary to check the washer bearing on concrete?  Are standard washers sized so that they always work for bearing (if so, for what concrete strength)?  

In this case, I am wondering about a 1 1/4" diameter F1554 Gr.55 anchor with double nuts, and a standard washer conforming to ASTM F436 (washer diameter 2 3/4")

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I do not think you need to consider the concrete bearing stress on the area of the washer. If you did, I think you'd find very high stresses in that region.
I believe this is accounted for in the break-out cone.  

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I take that back...I'm looking through a similar calc now and I see where I have checked bearing area's as given in AISC Design Guide One (boooo).
A 1.25" rod with nut only has a bearing area of 2.24 sq. in. and a concrete pull out strength of 50.2 kips for 4 ksi conc.; from AISC DG1 table 3.2
 

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

You have over 4-1/2 square inches of contact area for the washer.  If you have 3000 psi concrete, that will take over 14,000 lbs of contact load.  If the compression in your bolts is greater than that, you might need to consider more bolts or a larger washer.  Usually not an issue.

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

If you're talking about a washer embedded in the concrete, you definitely have to check it.  This is the pull-out failure per App. D.  That being said, a standard washer is probably worthless in this case, the bearing stresses will be so high that it will probably fail in bending.  If you need more contact area then provided by the nut itself, put a plate washer on it and size the thickness for bending.  I've rarely encountered a pull-out controlled anchor.

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

Pullout tends to be the controlling case for very deeply embedded high strength (GR105) anchors in which you are trying to get the failure to occur in the steel for ductility concerns.  You will find you need plate washers to force the failure into the steel anchor once the embedment is deep enough to prevent breakout from controlling.   

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I should make my earlier poor posts a little more clear.
Section D5.3 (I believe) has an equation for pullout. Part of that equation is the bearing area of the anchor.
 
I thought you were going to check the bearing ONLY based on the area of the washer, which would cause the stress to be very high most likely.  

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

(OP)
Thanks for the input everyone.

In response to Ron's comment, I'm checking someone's existing design and the load is well above 14 kips (about 26k).  The only way I know to check bearing is to use the formula in ACI 318 10.14.1 and I'm coming up with about 15k ultimate capacity.

I'm not talking about pullout, I'm talking about localized crushing of the concrete at the plate washer.  Using the 10.14.1 formula, it doesn't work, but is this the appropriate way to do it?

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

That was what I thought you were doing and I do not think that is the correct approach, but I could be wrong.
 
Personally, I have had the same question & I have always checked it as straight bearing pressure the way you are saying and used plate washers to accommodate the bearing stress for anchors with large tensile forces.
 

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

"pull out" is a localized bearing check of the concrete. Unless I'm missing something this is pretty straightforward.  You get a much higher
bearing capacity because it is local and extremely confined.  Look in App. D.  It seems pretty clear cut.

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I'm trying to picture how concrete completely confined would crush. You'd need to make the washer thicker than the nut to get the concrete to crush before the washer gave out. It may happen, but I have a hard time picturing it in my mind.
 

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

The thickness needs to be designed for bending......... As noted above.  

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I can never see the need to use a standard washer as they aren't much bigger than the nut.
A 1.25" nut has a width-across-flats of 2" I think. The width at the points is about 2.3". So, your bending check would be on a 3/8" cantilever at the most.
I also don't see the need for double embedded nuts. I'm pretty sure one nut will develop the strength of the rod.  

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I'll take a guess here (no books around) ....
I think the pull out check is:

Np = (0.7)x(8fc')x(Area of Bearing)x 1.4

The 1.4 factor only applies if the concrete is found to be uncracked by yada yada....I never used the 1.4 factor unless I had to. I'd just check first with out the factor.

SEIT- The bearing stress is assumed to act over an inclined plane in this case, no?

Hopefully someone can confirm what I have said here.  

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

Toad-

You have it right.  That value (while I agree it gives a very high bearing stress) is the stress at which the concrete will begin to crush under the bearing area of the nut (or plate).  I'm not sure what you mean by an inclined plane.  

From what I can gather, the reason the bearing stress is so high is because of confinement and the failure mechanism is actually crushing of the concrete.  I rarely see cylinder breaks where the concrete crushes.  If there were a confining force to the cylinders (in cylinder tests) such that the concrete was forced to crush instead failing in whatever manner it does, I guess the f'c values would be through the roof.

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

Good point with the cylinder breaks...we break all of our own and I know I have never seen one crush.
As far as the inclined plane, I must be mixing things up here (easy to do with App. D, no?). I think I was falsely assuming that the bearing stress was spread out over the area of a "pull out cone".  

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I have always wondered what would happen if you poured a concrete cylinder inside say an XXS steel pipe, then loaded it into the press and tried to crush it.

ToadJones, you have access to such equipment?  Maybe you could run a little experiment and post some photos? :)

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

I did something similar with my son for science last year.  We put loose sand inside a toilet paper tube and loaded it with everything we could find.  We got it up to over 700 pounds without failing it.  We had to stop because the stack of stuff we had on top was getting too high and too dangerous.  That was loose sand!

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

SEIT, that's awesome.  Assuming 1.5" diameter, you got almost 400 psi out of loose sand and cardboard.  With concrete and steel pipe, I imagine one would reach the limit of the test press.

Now extrapolate that to the anchor bolt bearing.  Assuming there were enough confinement, I imagine the concrete bearing would never physically govern.  My guess would be that one of the other failure modes would be reached first.

Anyone know of tests set up to force failure in concrete bearing?

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

(OP)
What everyone is saying makes sense.  I don't see how the concrete could "crush" when it is so confined.  That's probably why Appendix D doesn't mention "bearing", but instead gives you all the breakout and blowout failure modes.

The equation in 10.14.1 is interesting.  I can imagine how this equation applies to a beam sitting on a concrete column, for example.  The failure mode would be some kind of "blowout" where a large chunk of the top of the column spalls off on an inclined plane.  If the area of the support is greater than the area of bearing, it lets you multiply the capacity by as much as a factor of 2.  I wonder why they limited it to a factor of 2.

I also just noticed that the commentary says "this section deals with bearing strength of concrete supports".  Since it is for supports, it makes sense that this equation would not apply for something like a steel column baseplate on a concrete footing.  The concrete failure mode in this scenario would always be one or two-way (punching) shear, or flexure, not "crushing".  I don't even think crushing is possible, if the concrete is confined.  So the bearing equation doesn't apply to a plate washer embedded in a footing, either.

This is one of those situations where I realize maybe I've been overconservative for the last 10 or so years.  It makes me wonder, why use plate washers at all?  Like Toad said, the standard washer isn't much bigger than the nut.  Why not use the nut (and standard washer, but the nut primarily) to "grab" the concrete when the anchor is in tension and start the failure cone that way?  The pressure on the nut would be very high, but nuts are thick, and either way, plate washer or not, the nut has to transfer the force through the threads onto the anchor.

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

Does not the ACI code allow an overstress for bearing based on the ratio of the bearing area over the gross area?

Dik

RE: anchor rod in tension embedded in concrete

PMR06-
Yes, We have our own equipment and there isn't a chance in hell I'd put a piece of HSS in the machine!!!!!
The equipment is not cheap and a piece of HSS would guaranteed max out the machine and damage it.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources