×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

(OP)
If you have a situation where you have 2 walls separated by a distance L say 5'.  One wall is a rigid wall possibly a foundation wall and the other wall is flexible wall such as an MSE wall.  They are both H=15' tall, with soil between them.  Is it reasonable to analyse the lateral soil pressure as follows:

Where ka is evaluated using coulomb's equation.

The force due to the soil pressure on the back of the flexible wall (z=0 is top of wall):
A triangular distribution (from z=0 to 5') =Ps1=ka*gamma*L*L/2 Resultant at z=L/3
A uniform distribution (from 5' to 15') = Ps2=ka*gamma*L*(H-L) Resultant at z=L+H/2

Is this reasonable as apposed to:
A triangular distribution (from 0 to 15') Ps=ka*gamma*H*H/2

Thanks   

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

I'd suggest you search this site; this has been discussed quite a bit.  I'd look up earth pressures for storage bins - silos.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

with the presence of geogrids, the matter seems moot, but I haven't had my coffee.  It'd seem to me that as an MSE wall, the 5-ft separation would all be in the reinforced zone and act as a gravity mass (i.e., after all, the block face is not falling).

My approach is to do the following (i.e., related to your OP):

Determine the friction angle
Using a protractor, strike a like from the wall face up to ground surface using a Rankine failure angle (i.e., 45-phi/2 as measured from the vertical).
Find where the line intersects the opposing wall (i.e., as you move down one wall, at some point the Rankine line will strike the other wall).
Below this depth, there will be no further horizontal stress increase.

You'll end up with a triangular top and a rectangular bottom.

Then again, others may have other approaches.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

That's what I'd do... - as fattdad suggests.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

(OP)
Thanks, yeah I was asking this question more as an academic one rather than practical situation.  Or else yes I would expect the geogrid to extend to the wall.  I tried searching the site and found a couple of posts but I was struggling to find exactly what I was looking for.

fattdad - that is pretty similar to what I was describing and along the lines of what I expected.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Isn't less than 5' of geogrid length too short for a 15' high MSE wall?  I hope the quoted example of 5' feet is not an actual geogrid length.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

(OP)
This was just to illustrate my question.  As I agree with you that would be bad.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

(OP)
I'm debating weather or not to start another thread with this question -

Can you recommend a good reference that discusses offset surcharges and lateral loads from applied surcharges. As applied to retaining walls.

I understand the basics however searching this site it seems that there are a few different methods out there - boussinesq, wetergaard..
It seems Bowle's book is good except it is geared toward a computer program.  There is also conduto's book.  I have Das but it doesn't go into much depth.

thanks

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

NAVFAC DM7.2 has effect of point and line loads behind a retaining wall.  It is on the www.vulcanhammer.net site

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

In general I agree that 5 ft would compromise the stability of the MSE wall.

In practice If I have a situation with two walls seperated I design it for the full load, because you never know if one day the adjacent property decides to backfill one side and bury one of the walls. I've worked on several projects where we found buried retaining wallsc(just cheaper than removing).

 

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Surcharge loads are an art. There are even descrepancies between manuals such as the USACE, USS Sheet Pile, and NAVFAC manuals. Software programers even have their own convuluted methods. The European codes typically are more comprehensive in covering surcharge loads. Unfortunately a lot of the surcharge loads assume elastic conditions, or are empirically based on research that had assumptions long lost.

The main items you have to think about are:
1) Flexibility of your wall
2) The surcharge load magnitude relative to your soil wedge (i.e. Is your failure plain significantly affected by the load, or is it minimal). Global vs local+global effects
3) proximity of the load
4) Soil stiffnes, poisson ratio, ability to arch, plasticity
5) type of load
etc...

Surcharge distributions are judgement calls.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

(OP)
InDepth - Yeah I've done a lot of research in the last few weeks since I originally posted this, thinking that there has to be a standard set of equations for offset surcharges and the back to back wall situation that I previously described.  However, it was as if I opened a can of worms because there are many different theories. I'm glad I did the research though as I now have a much better understanding (or lack there of) of the stresses that occur in soil (probably should have payed better attention in my geotech classes).

EIT

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Geogrids are usually 0.7 to 0.8 x the height of the wall (See BS 8006).

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Do an old fashioned trial wedge analysis, this will give you the horizontal loading on the wall for an active case.  It is a dirt simple calc as well.

Another approach would be to use bin pressures.  I think Blodgett (sp?) talks about it in one of his books.  You will not get much help in pressure reduction at these H/D ratios is I remember correctly.

As for the point/line surcharge, the Boussinesq method is vert straightforward, but it assumes a rigid wall.  In reality most walls are flexible so the pressures given using this method will be rather conservative since they drop once the wall moves.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

There are two "real" theoretical solutions, I don't know which is correct, to the original thread.

Its either
1) Having evaluated wedge equilibrium personally, the active pressure for a wedge is proportional to its mass.  So if you know it has a regular shape of a right triangle of 45 + phi/2, and you chop off the mass of the back 1/3 because of the adjacent wall, then you only have 2/3 of Ka computed by regular equation.  The centroid of loading is still probably the lower third point.

2) However, the back edge of the wedge (pushing against the building wall) does have an appreciable force, which is 1/2 Ka H^2 for a shallower wedge, which this time may be shallow enough it does not interact with the MSE wall on the other side. The building wall would have to resist this force.  By force principles, the soil must feel an equal and opposite reaction, e.g. the wall adds that amount of active pressure to the soil.
With enough reflections, any narrow soil wedge will have the full active pressure at the base of the lowest wall.

I believe that the second version is the most correct, design both walls for full-height active pressure.  As noted above, this is somewhat moot for a wall with MSE-fill, provided you design the MSE internal stability that way.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

Last year I was trying the parametrical abilities in autocad 2010 and made one parametric dwg dealing with total active push when soil between two walls, not one of the more beautiful that I did but still curious to see. I find it still works in release 2011.

RE: Reduced Lateral Pressure For Back to Back Walls

And the page of the book

Apuntes de
Geotecnia, Cimientos y Puentes de Fábrica
Muros y Taludes

José Entrecanales Ibarra y Carlos Lorente de No
ETSICCP, Madrid

It seems a book of the thirties' yet my brother who is an Ingeniero de Caminos bought it when studying the matter in the early seventies'... graphical statics, long lost.

The matter is further developed in 3 more pages surely following more complicated methods per the references at the foot of this page.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources