×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Follow-up to the IR thread

Follow-up to the IR thread

Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
I am trying to do temperature measurement through a sheet plastic window.
I have the electronics portion working well in my lab but all the "IR" windows I put in front of it pass so little energy that the unit is useless. ("windows glass" and clear polycarb)
The supplier of the sensor says that I am looking to pass 5 to 15 um. These windows seem pitched to near IR and my range extends deep into mid IR.
I have been trolling the net and found recommendations to use polyethylene so I grabbed some clear poly parts bags and they work very well.
While these work from an optical point to view I need a rigid window on the production machine.
I tried some sheet HDPE from a local plastic shop and that did pass some signal but the losses were unacceptable high.
Any suggestions on what I should be looking for?
Thanks in advance.

 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Saran wrap works pretty well.  Sometimes you can go thinner, rather than more stiff.

Neither window glass nor PC are particularly useful in the IR.  Bear in mind that the near-infrared than passes through glass or PC is at least 2x lower in wavelength than your band of interest.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Germanium, silicon, zinc selenide, zinc sulphide are the more commonly used IR window materials.  However, they are not even remotely cheap, and generally require expensive coatings to get the full benefit of their use.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
Thanks for the link to Topas.

The transmission chart only goes to 800 um and does not tell me anything about 800 to 1500 um range, with the 800 um to 1200 um being the areas of highest interest. It is worrisome that the copy that goes with the chart mention near IR by name.

I don't really know much about polyethylene so maybe this is a really stupid question - is there a grade or type that has the same optical properties as the soft clear bags but is rigid in a 0.03" sheet?
I have hope that this is true as most motion sensors are working in the same optical range and the ones I have looked at have a grayish translucent rigid plastic with a slight bluish cast.
 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
Hmm, excellent point.

I am thinking in terms of a part that once die cut would keep a flat shape while the assembler positions it over the machine and presses it in place using a PSA film.

I would consider a overhead write-on sheet as rigid.

I would consider poly-sheeting used to enclose a construction site as flexible to the point of being a impediment to easy assembly.
 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Is this supposed to be a production product?  Why not simply install the Saran wrap onto a frame that is in turn installed into its site?

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
In this application the sensor bar will be mounted on a vehicle with road dust and dirt hitting the sensor at highway speeds.

Saran wrap my not be enough to keep gravel from getting into the sensor package.

This particular build is a prototype so I can use a poly parts bag as it is pretty tough (already tested and works well) but for production I need a better solution.

I will try the tupperware as soon as I can get one in the lab.
 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

OK, I'm confused.  Is the window for looking in, or for looking out?  If looking out, you need a hard window, with hard carbon coating, i.e., germanium or silicon, with AR coatings and hard coating.  Anything less will not meet all the environmental requirements, particularly if your sensor is doing any imaging of any sort.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
The sensor is looking out up the housing, with a 7 degree beam angle so it can be thought of as imaging.

The poly bag I have been working with seems to be working well; the sensing area does not seem to be markedly changed and the drop in output is manageable and can be calibrated out.

It is my hope that a hard sheet of plastic  will work as will and keep the envirionment out up my box well enough to do some limited field testing. In a perfect world this material will be durable enough for a production product.
  

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Plastic, outdoors, is also subject to UV damage, and needs to be coated for protection, which may prevent IR transmission.

Additionally, most plastics will concede when met with gravel, and the resultant dings and scratches will not promote good imaging, and will reduce the effective transmission of the window.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Dishwasher safe Tupperware is more likely PP.

The PP Tupperware is smooth and shiny. HDPE Tupperware has grainy surface and is translucent, not transparent, at least to visible light.

PE is quite poor to UV and will be badly damaged by one summers exposure in any temperate or tropical climate. Stabilisers improve it, but as IR said, they may filter the bandwidth you are trying to measure. Surface coatings do not go easy with PE.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Why does it raise questions? For all polymers you can measure or find the IR spectrum showing exactly what wavelengths are absorbed and which are not. Thus you know whether it's transparent at your wavelength.

Chris DeArmitt PhD FRSC CChem

www.phantomplastics.com
Consultant to the plastics industry

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
The problem is that this "find the polymer you are interested in" is my original question:
"Any suggestions on what I should be looking for?"

When I said "this raises almost as many questions as it answers" it is because it describes a few properties in:
"thin sheets of polyolefin plastics, and high density polyethylene in particular." but does not nail down what material I should be asking for.

As mentioned above I tested several materials that meet this basic definition but there have been huge differences in performance.

Some variables that I have no clue on:  extruded vs cast, density, degree of crystallinity, and whatever else it is that I should know about specifying plastics but don't.

As can be seen from the links referenced some manufactures are offering products with plastic windows so it must be possible but they are cleverly not providing a material description that I can specify in my own products. (Ok - Kobe will sell me the material directly but still really don't tell me what it is.)

I have samples coming of the Evonik product. I have been talking to my local plasic suppliers and I get the same basic thing - tell me the resin and other details and I can get you samples; I don't know what to ask for.



 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

You can get some material and have it analyzed. Should be simple to tell you what polymer it is. Ironically, it's the infrared spectrum of the polymer that tells what it is. If you want contact to a lab, the one I use is www.stabilization-technologies.com

Thanks for explaining your uncertainty. It can be a minefield.

Extruded versus cast, should be no difference.

Amorphous materials like polystyrene, SAN, PMMA and polycabonate should be better than semi-crystalline materials like PE, PP and nylons because crystals can scatter light.

Density makes no difference in itself.

Chris DeArmitt PhD FRSC CChem

www.phantomplastics.com
Consultant to the plastics industry

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

Another tip is that the simplest plastics have the lowest IR adsorption. What I mean is that the fewer types of chemical bond, the less the IR adsorption. So, polyethylene has very little adsorption as it only has 2 types of chemical bond. Polycarbonate would have lots of IR adsorption peaks as it has lots of different types of chemical bonds.

Chris DeArmitt PhD FRSC CChem

www.phantomplastics.com
Consultant to the plastics industry

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

(OP)
Follow-up: I just completed testing with the Evonik Acrylite FF sample in a IR temperature sensing application.

The test was performed with the Black 9K020 GT (was 1146-0 IRT) material, 2.9 mm thickness.

The transmission was in the few percent range which means that material is unusable for this application.

The search continues.
 

RE: Follow-up to the IR thread

The problem was likely not the sheet but the black colorant. The most common of which is carbon black that blocks everything including IR light.

Try another color, or start with colorless. If you need IR transparent black colorant contact BASF.

Chris DeArmitt PhD FRSC CChem

www.phantomplastics.com
Consultant to the plastics industry

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources