×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

(OP)
I'm working on a project in California in a high-seismic region.  The geotechnical engineer recommended use of Ss and S1 based on a 10% chance of exceedance in a 50-year period, instead of the normal standard of 2% for seismic and wind.  The 10/50 seismic accelerations are about half of the 2/50.

When is it acceptable to use a 10% exceedance probability?  This is an Occupancy Category II, two-story building.

RE: The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

As far as I know, never for the building that you describe.  2% in 50 years equates to a once in 2500 years event.  10% in 50 years equates to a once in 500 years event.  10% in 50 may be acceptable for a temporary structure, but I would have to do some research first.

RE: The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

I have heard of reduced seismic for retrofit of some existing buildings.  Check International Existing Building Code (hope I got that right).  But I don't think it was as much as 50% off.

So, why would the Geotech suggest doing that?  I wonder if the Geotech would be willing to stamp the structural calcs.

MJ

RE: The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

Geotech may not know the relevant code.
10/50 is the data which was originally published by the USGS in 1991. It is used by various federal agencies for design, although not necessarily for buildings. See the link.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1995/596/appxC.html

the USGS hazards map site also lists 10/50, 5/50 and 2/50 maps all updated in 2008.

http://geohazards.usgs.gov/hazards/apps/cmaps/

RE: The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

Make sure that performance based seismic design is not a requirement for the project. This requires certain performance of a structure to be maintained based on a given recurrence interval of a seismic event.  

RE: The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

Ask the goetech what he is getting at. It may be that he is giving you something for Ss and S1 that he recommends you use instead of SDs and SD1.  If that is the case then they may be higher or more conservative values than what you would get if you use 2 in 50 for Ss and S1 then reduce them by 1/3 to get Sds and SD1.  The arbitrary reduction factor for Sds and Sd1 were put into the code to mimic the 10/50 values under the old way of doing things for sites like california.  If we all used 2 in 50 straigt up in california the only thing you would be able to build is bunkers.

RE: The 10/50 Seismic Acceleration

(OP)
I figured it out.  The geotech was giving Sds and Sd1 values based on 2%/50yr criteria; it was simply mislabeled as Ss and S1.  So it looks like 10/50 should not be used unless the project specifically requires it.  Thank you to everyone for your responses!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources