×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CMU Firewall

CMU Firewall

CMU Firewall

(OP)
I am designing a cmu block firewall.  It is intended to have aluminum "fall away" clips on each side of the wall.  My question is-- Can I consider these clips as a brace point for the wall, our do I need to design the wall as a free standing cantilevered wall (two and three stories)?

Thanks

RE: CMU Firewall

You cannot consider the wall braced by "fall away" clips on each side.

Moreover, the concept of using fall away clips on each side of a two or three story firewall is wrong.  Much better to tie the wall to both sides, then, if you have a fire on one side, the wall is still braced by ties on the other side.

BA

RE: CMU Firewall

Another option to consider would be two separate walls.  This way the wall and footing can be designed as if the wall is supported and will help you achieve what you are trying to do.

One other concern is aluminum clips.  What temperature is required to have them 'break' away?  I have always used ties made of zinc with a melt point of 792 degrees F.

RE: CMU Firewall

A fire wall rating is defined environmentally as being able to resist the heat and passage of flames and gasses for a prescribed period of time.

If the wall lateral support fails to provide support, it becomes a structural system where it must be designed as a cantilever or reliable support must be provided to provide lateral support for life and safety.

Commonly, bond beams and bolts to the wall at the intermediate levels are used. This can provide lateral support in both directions in case one side is destroyed. This assumes the flooring system is capable of providing the stability as BA suggests.

Dick

Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design.

RE: CMU Firewall

I have always wonder about connecting the wall to both sides. You don't want the falling side to pull the other side down, so what force are you to plan on resisting? FM has some forces generated by certain wall systems on a common wall. They can be significant.

I like the two walls, connecting each to its own side. At least I understand how it works.


As far as the AL clips go, how is one to know that the clips will heat up before the wall tries to fall and pull everything down? To me the logic in the clips seems a bit lacking.  

RE: CMU Firewall

There is no question that a double firewall is the best solution.  The difficulty is in getting the owner to spend the additional money when he knows that the code permits a single firewall.

BA

RE: CMU Firewall

(OP)
Sorry for the slow reply.  I was out of the office for a few days.  

I should offer some more information.  The each side of the cmu wall is free standing.  Neither side would be dependent on the cmu wall for ANY support.  I am trying to avoid constructing an 8 meter cantilevered wall.  I want allow for one side to burn to the ground, while the other is still standing.  Furthermore, I don't want the wall to fall on anyone during the fire fight or the cleanup afterward.  Perhaps I'm hoping to have my cake and eat it too.

(The ironic thing here is that both buildings are constructed of cold formed steel.  The structure itself is noncombustible.  Please don't ask, I'll have to write an epistle to explain how we got here.  Suffice it to say, governmental bent and suspenders and duct tape and super glue and etc., etc. etc.)

RE: CMU Firewall

Commentary C of User's Guide - NBC 2005 "Structural Integrity of Firewalls" considers four design approaches...Double Firewall, Cantilever Firewall, Tied Firewall and Weak-link connections.

The double firewall and cantilever firewall are easy to understand but expensive to construct.

For a tied firewall, the structure on each side must be capable of resisting the lateral forces from the fire side.  The commentary provides some guidance in determining the horizontal forces from a collapsing structure.

For weak-link connections, the commentary states "If a weak link is provided on each side of the firewall, the link on the fire side will break away while the link on the non-fire side will not."

I don't know how to detail the weak links in order to be confident of that result.  If the weak link on the non-fire side breaks away first, the firewall will collapse toward the fire, defeating the entire purpose.  For that reason, I have never used the weak link approach.

BA

RE: CMU Firewall

(OP)
Thanks BA.  That will definitely guide me in the right direction.  Thanks a million.

RE: CMU Firewall

You're welcome.

BA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources