×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity
5

Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

(OP)
I am having trouble finding the surface area a troxler gauge can provide a good reading for. I had read somewhere that it was 10,000 square feet but I thought that sounded high. Does anyone know if this is true or not?

RE: Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

2
That makes no sense at all.  The surface area, under the backscatter mode, is essentially the footprint of the gage.  For direct transmission mode, surface area is irrelevant.

If you are looking for how much surface area a single density test represents, it can be anywhere from a few hundred to several thousand, depending on what your specifications require.  As an example, it is common to do one test for each 500 square yards of pavement, per layer.  This works out to be one test for each 4500 square feet of surface area, per layer.

RE: Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

(OP)
Thanks a lot Ron. I was looking for the surace area it represents.

I am still pretty new to the quality control field. Are there any good rules of thumb to use if specifications are not readily available?

RE: Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

milanov...not sure what your position is, but be sure that you understand the differences between Quality Control, Quality Assurance, and Quality Verification.

Yes, there are rules of thumb for a variety of testing issues...

Concrete - 1 sample set for each 150 cy
Density - 1 in each footing or 1 per 2000 sf of surface per lift, but in no case less than 3 tests in any area

For any other issues, test at a rate of 10% of the issue.

RE: Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

Ron gives some pretty good advice.

Only disagreements are you should always have the full footprint under the gauge.

His second post is good rules of thumb, but I would add that the required frequency should be checked first in the project specs, then your companies rules of thumb, then what Ron has provided here.

RE: Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

This is a statistical confidence question rather than one of the device.  The DOT's usually have this boiled down to a once per X type spec, but it is based on a confidence level derived from having X passing samples per unit of area.

The gauge is like a geotech boring; you now know only the properties of / under the area of what you just tested.  Even at that, the gauge's measured density will still have some variation from a core sample run in the lab.

RE: Troxler Nuclear Moisture-Density Gauge Capacity

There is no substitute for direct visual evaluation during earthwork.  A qualified geotechnical engineer or engineering technician should be watching the earthworks and observing via sight and feel the nature of compaction, the moisture content and the character of the completed fill.  If the contractor is directing fills from multiple cuts and the nature of the fill is variable as the width of a pan, then that would require a different measure of testing than a site where the contractor was placing dense-graded aggregate from a stone quarry.  I'm not saying, can the specs, I'm just saying not to limit the work to some divine number that you learn from this forum or the spec book. Reason must prevail.

10,000 sf is very typical for a typical QC program.  That said, if widely variable, the owner's interest would be better represented by more-frequent testing (providing you have an appropriate Proctor value to use - that's often where the body's buried).

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources