×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis
2

Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

(OP)
Can anyone comment on the benefits of performing an acoustic analysis on a recriprocating nat gas compressor, via time domain method versus frequency domain.

I understand that software for performing time domain analysis has only been in use for a couple years, while frequency domain anlaysis goes back 50 or 60 years (maybe more), and has been widely successful.

However, as the end user, a couple of analysis companies are saying that doing studies in the time domain is the greatest new thing...while a couple of the analysis companies that we typically use, have not adopted this method, and still use frequency domain anaylsis.

I have a vague understanding of the fundamental difference in the two approaches, however, I'm unceratin of the differene in accuracy of the two.  Does time domain actually predict actual operation more closely...and is this the way that that technology is going?  Or, should we just stick to the tried and true method we've relied on for years, and let the technology grow until more people accept that method until we jump into it?

Opinions, please.

 

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Can you give a link to what you mean by time domain analysis?

Sounds like salestalk.

There are some time related analyses that are worth doing, but I'd always start in the frequency domain.

 

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Interesting, is it common practice to use correlation methods prior to performing spectral analysis?

how do you handle the dc component?

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Both transient and frequency domain acoustic analyses have been around for a long time, and I don't mean just in theory, but in computational software. Is there a specific advancement in acoustic time domain analysis that these softwares claim?

For most acoustic problems the interest is in a steady state solution due to harmonic excitations which is ideal for frequency domain analysis. There are some exceptions like simulation of explosions for example, which are more efficiently performed in the time domain. What is the issue in the simulation of reciprocating natural gas compressors that warrants time domain analysis?

Nagi Elabbasi
Veryst Engineering

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Depends on the problem you are working on. You may use frequency domain or time domain analysis. Or you may use both by using wavelet transforms.
 

http://www.novosim.com
Product Development Services (cad/cae/test)
Medical Device R&D

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Probably with reciprocating machines, the pulsation levels may too high to apply linear wave theory. From an academic standpoint, non linear wave equations could be better solved in time domain analysis than in frequency domain. Nevertheless, for all industrial applications, they should not make a lot of difference.

Jeyaselvan

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

(OP)
I got my answer, and jeyaselvan is on the right track.

To me, the end-user, basically, is that both time-domain and frequency domain both agree on the frequency response of an reciprocating gas system.  However, the difference is in the amplitude prediction accuracy of the two methods...time domain accurately predicts the amplitude levels across the frequency spectrum, while a frequency domain analysis will underestimate the response and not in a consistent manner.

So if one can seperate forcing frequencies and mechanical natural frequencies by a good margin, then frequency domain is sufficient.

However, to more accurately predict shaking forces due to unblanaced acoustic forces, then time-domain analysis is the way to go.

So far, we have had good results with our tech company who solely uses frequency domain analysis.  However, not a lot of testing has been done to compare pulsation amplitude levels to the original levels predicted by the model.

Hope this helps some of you in the future.

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Just a quick comment.

Time Domain Analysis has been around a lot longer than a few years.  It just had a different name but is the same thing.  

It was called the "Chart Recorder".  You got amplitude versus time.  Faster paper speed equals more resolution.  Chart recorders were around long before swept filters which were among the first tools for frequency analysis.

 

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

You need to be equally happy in both domains.  In the domain of rotational machinery, I'd always start in the frequency domain.  But I'd insist on a Campbell diagram (or colormap, waterfall, etc) to begin with.  Then you get to see the whole behaviour in a single picture.  Local behaviours can be found and studied in more detail by slicing through the colormap.  

Specifics can be found by viewing small sections of data in the time domain.

Many P&E engineers are spooked by anything to do with frequency domain analysis, so you have to keep reminding them that a spectrum is just another way of describing the shape of a time (or crank angle) domain signal.

- Steve

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

At the risk of flogging a dead horse...

That's all well and good, but I think the OP is interested more in how you simulate time domain signals rather than display them.

I would also infer that the OP is interested in looking at pressures inside the system rather than radiated noise.

M

--
Dr Michael F Platten

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

Hmm, I agree.  I usually associate the word "analysis" with processing of measure (or simulated) data.  If by "analysis" he means "simulation", that's a different matter entirely.

If one is attempting to simulate the behaviour of pressures inside the system, or noise radiated from orifices due to velocity fluctuations, then non-linear, time-domain simulation has been standard practice in the automotive engine industry for c. 15-20 years.  Some die-hards still swear by their linear, frequency-domain models, but the tide has long turned.

Non-linear time-domain models can (obviously) capture non-linear effects (high SPLs, mean flow, temperature gradients).  They can also simulataneously predict acoustics AND performance.  It's easy to reduce radiated noise in isolation, but how will your measures afffect back pressure?

- Steve

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

time domain offers little insight especially when it comes to characterizing system modes or linking system specific design changes with response changes.

frequency domain methods are a very good tool if properly used.

  

RE: Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Acoustic Analysis

(OP)
Just to clarify my original post, I meant to indicate how these apply to design simulation of acoustic systems...not field analysis.

I believe we will continue to allow the use of both methods of simulation...linear, frequency domain, and non-linear time domain.

As we have installed many recip machines from 1000 to 8000 hp using frequency domain-based designs which have worked well so far.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources