×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flexural Stiffness

Flexural Stiffness

Flexural Stiffness

(OP)
Can anyone explain to me how and what flexural stiffness as used in the AISC 13th edition on page 16.1-426 under torsional bracing is? From my understanding, flexural stiffness is just EI, how is it that they get 2EI/L for single curvature and 6EI/L for double curvature? And also, if possible, how is it that the plate attached to bottom flanges will bend in single curvature and plate attached to the top flange bend in double curvature? My problem is I'm attaching a plate to the web of a beam and it doesnt fall into either case

RE: Flexural Stiffness

The stiffness of a beam is affected by the end restraint conditions. Any structural analysis book should cover it pretty thoroughly.

RE: Flexural Stiffness

I don't know AISC, any edition, so I'm not sure I can help you.  As I recall, the flexural stiffness of a beam is the moment required to produce unit rotation at the point of application of the moment.

Consider a simple beam A-B of span L.  Apply a moment at point B.  What is the rotation at B?  Call it θB.

The Moment diagram is triangular, 0 at A and M at B.  The area under the M/EI diagram is ML/2EI, so the rotation at A is ML/6EI and the rotation at B is ML/3EI.

θB = ML/3EI

or M = θB*3EI/L.

By definition, Stiffness = M when θB =1.

So stiffness = 3EI/L when A is hinged.

If A is fixed against rotation, the beam is stiffer. A larger moment is required at point B in order to produce unit rotation at B.  In fact, the stiffness of the beam with point A fixed against rotation is 4EI/L.  Check it out.

BA

RE: Flexural Stiffness

I don't know AISC, any edition, so I'm not sure I can help you.  As I recall, the flexural stiffness of a beam is the moment required to produce unit rotation at the point of application of the moment.

Consider a simple beam A-B of span L.  Apply a moment at point B.  What is the rotation at B?  Call it θB.

The Moment diagram is triangular, 0 at A and M at B.  The area under the M/EI diagram is ML/2EI, so the rotation at A is ML/6EI and the rotation at B is ML/3EI.

θB = ML/3EI

or M = θB*3EI/L.

By definition, Stiffness = M when θB =1.

So stiffness = 3EI/L when A is hinged.

If A is fixed against rotation, the beam is stiffer. A larger moment is required at point B in order to produce unit rotation at B.  In fact, the stiffness of the beam with point A fixed against rotation is 4EI/L.  Check it out.

 

BA

RE: Flexural Stiffness

Didn't mean to send it twice.  Sorry.

BA

RE: Flexural Stiffness

BA...    That's O.K., look at it this way, the rest of us are now twice as smart for your effort.

RE: Flexural Stiffness

BAretired,

Double posting is not allowed and triple posting is heinous crime punishable by being slapped around the head with a wet fish!

Nice post though.

RE: Flexural Stiffness

BA should get an "E" for effort.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Flexural Stiffness

How about a "WF" for wet fish?

BA

RE: Flexural Stiffness

You mean all these years when I speced. a 24" WF beam, I was actually telling them to weld up a wet fish to support the roof?

RE: Flexural Stiffness

Amazing, isn't it dhengr?

BA

RE: Flexural Stiffness

(OP)
Thanks BAretired, I asked 5 other engineers before resorting to this website. It is kind of weird that I have examples showing that flexural stiffness is EI. Maybe flexural stiffness can mean more than one thing?

RE: Flexural Stiffness

I believe that the discusion in the Article on Torsional Bracing Stiffness accounts for the rotation at the far end of the stiffener.  If the rotation at the far end of the brace were zero, then the stiffness would be 4EI/L, as shown by BA above.  However, if the far end of the brace rotates the same amount as the near end, as often happens when the bracing is attached to the top flange, the stiffener requires more moment to rotate it to the unit angle.  The additional moment is 2EI/L, giving an apparent stiffness of 6EI/L.  If the beam at the far end rotates in the opposite direction (single curvature), then the required moment to rotate a unit angle is reduced by the 2EI/L, so the apparent stiffness is 2EI/L (4EI/L minus 2EI/L).   

RE: Flexural Stiffness

Stiffness in general is an extensive property, meaning it is directly dependent on the system one is investigating.
That is to say that it is only useful on a case-by-case basis.
"I have situation 'x' with such n' such end conditions, then beam "A" is stiffer than beam "B"" In this case beams "A" and "B" differ by EI.
Remove the system constraints and the term is relatively meaningless.  

wow, this would make a really good Critical Thinking term paper, huh?  2thumbsup

RE: Flexural Stiffness

Ogork1,

The confusion is because of the question: Flexural stiffness of what?

EI is the stiffness of the section
2EI/L e.t.c. are the stiffness of the member.

Both are valid for sifferent situations.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources