×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Site classification of an excavated area
2

Site classification of an excavated area

Site classification of an excavated area

(OP)
I am working on a foundation design for a property that has been excavated 25m below the ground surface. Would the site classification for seismic design be based on the soil properties from the ground surface or the soil properties from the foundation elevation (25m below ground)?

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

I would expect that it would be a combination of both.

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

I believe it should be from ground surface.

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

this sounds like a major structure, pick the most conservative one and use that

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

The site seismic classification is considered from lowest building slab level (not foundation level).  For example, for a building without basement, it is the ground surface.  
We you say "a property excavated to 25 m below ground surface", I get the impression that you are referring to a property much larger than the planned structure.  In this case, the site seismic classification is based on the current ground surface (assuming no basement) which is 25 m lower than previous ground surface.  If the footprint of the excavated area is small (relative of the 25 m depth of excavation), you are in a complicate situation which require detail analyses.
 

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

it depends. basically, if the soil touches the structure (or is reasonably close), you should use the original/higher ground surface if no additional dynamic analysis is performed. essentially, the soil at the ground surface is going to move like the rest of the ground surface while the deeper conditions will move less. therefore, your structure must be designed for the various accelerations and displacements. if you have tall basement walls, then i highly recommend performing additional analysis so that the wall design can account for the added seismic loads. being 25m in the ground, you should have varying values with depth therefore i'd perform a more sophisticated analysis. if you have a well-qualified engineer perform the analysis, they can help you optimize the analysis/design. there are many exploratory and analysis options available but finding an engineer that actually understands and can provide those services is the tricky part.

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

My understanding is that the soil site classification from on the UBC (site as A,B,C,D,E,F)  are based on borings (uncorrected SPT N values) up to 100 ft depth. But, it could be of any depth you have borings. I would go to the source from your site class comes from and learn a little bit more about it.

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

read nehrp 450, fema 451b, nehrp 611, or a few others (search eng-tips since i've posted the linked before). the language is in there. for below grade structures (basement walls, deep foundations, etc), you should use site class from the ground surface unless dynamic modeling is performed to assess the below grade structures. for a class, i recommend the asce seminar for ground motion assessment by dr. praveen malhotra.

RE: Site classification of an excavated area

Msucog,
I believe geo77's original post raised the question of shallow foundations cast upon the bottom of a deep excavation.

That would not be the same case as of deep foundations.

I also believe that many regulations take as a reference level for deep foundations (on piles, on slurry walls, on caissons) the foundations head near ground surface.

And I fully agree on the fact that with tall basement walls we might be in a more complex area requiring in depth analysis; site classification based on the deep level might be under conservative, whereas if referred to the ground surface it may be over conservative.

In major works with huge amounts of concrete involved I reckon design optimization may allow to save substantial amounts of money.

In some building regulations (like the Italian ones) unfortunately there are no suggetions for such a case.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources