×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Accuracy of Pile Load Test

Accuracy of Pile Load Test

Accuracy of Pile Load Test

(OP)
Our company was asked to monitor and document two axial compression and two axial tensile load tests on auger pressure grouted displacement piles.  The two compression piles were fitted w/ strain gages at select locations and all the piles were loaded per quick test method A (no reloading).  The piles were not loaded to failure due to the test frame limiting capacity; but were loaded to sufficient capacity to ascertain a minimum embedment depth for the production piles.  The strain gages were necessary due to overburden removal that would be required at a later date.

In our report, we stated that the piles were tested in accordance with the quick load methods presented in ASTM 1143 and 3689 and described all of the measurement devices and the details of the pile configuration, grout factors etc. We also included compressive data of the grout, the equipment calibration records etc. for all measurement devices.

Now we have been asked to 'certify the accuracy' of the test results.

It is my opinion that this is a ridiculous request.  Can someone please explain to me how I can produce a statement that could 'certify the accuracy' of a load test?  Or should I produce a statement at all to this effect?



 

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

Assuming you or someone in responsible charge in your organization will be signing/sealing the report, there is no need to provide further certification.  Signing/sealing is a form of certification that does not need to be repeated by a separate certification document.  Further, there are no real criteria for the accuracy of the test other than the measurement parameters, which you have covered.

Many states frown upon the issuance of separate statements of certification.  Check your state law. Certifications are redundant to the engineering licensing process and only serve to increase your liability.

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

Check also with your professional liability insurer about certifications.  By certifying something, you may be stepping beyond the the normal standard of care.  In my opinion, specs ask for certifications as a way to throw the responsibility to someone else.  If you sealed a design, it should not need further certification.  If you did not provide full-time inspection services, you should not certify it was built perfectly.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

i recall as an expert witness being asked something like: "Was your work done with the usual ordinary care that is required for these tests?".

You might send a short reply with such a statement, but no mention of accuracy or precision.

The words "ordinary care" seem to have some legal meaning to cover the average situation an engineer runs into.

A quote from another WEB site: "conformity to the reasonable business standards that prevail in a particular area for a particular business"

If you want to get more fussy, you need your lawyer to advise.
 

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

Taking it an absurd step further; next you will be asked to certify the validity of the certification for the accuracy of the test.

The original signed report should suffice.

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

Good advice above.  I would say, if all your certifications are valid, the test was done in accordance with ASTM spec, that's all I would say.

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

i would also include the Jack calibrations on the report. And as you guys says, the signature of a PE should be sufficient.  

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

I've been through this several times.  The DOT job specs require the designer to write a letter "certifying" that the sheeting wall was built properly.  Also, most projects now require special inspections.  If you are not on the job getting PAID to do inspections, you should not be certifying anything.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

(OP)
Thanks to all.
This is what I expected to hear.

RE: Accuracy of Pile Load Test

To add to oldestguy's post, the use of "ordinary" skill and care (when practicing under the same or similar conditions and in the same locale as other competent engineers in the profession)  is all that is required of an engineer to meet the standard of care for his practice.  Our standard of care does not require perfection, nor does it require certification of job-specific items.  

The standard of care for engineers is routinely defined as:  "That level of ordinary skill and care used by other competent engineers practicing under the same or similar conditions in the same locale".

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources