×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seismic Design of Operable Walls

Seismic Design of Operable Walls

Seismic Design of Operable Walls

(OP)
I have a project which will have a large operable partition, track supported at the top with a cam-lock friction sole at the bottom.  When open the wall will be 80' wide and 30' tall; when closed the panels (4'x 30') slide along the track and will rotate 90 deg. to stack in a pocket at one side of the building.

I know this will come under the C&C portion of the code, but I'm wondering how to approach the seismic design. Would you just look at the two conditions, open and stacked and add the weight to the supporting structure dead load?  

Anyone there in cyberland had to work on one of these?

RE: Seismic Design of Operable Walls

Engineering judgement and information from the manufacture is needed to determine if the two condition will govern the design. If one half the partion weight is at midspan when the partion is halfway closed, this could govern. Frequently, the partion manufacture's deflection criteria will govern the gravity design. My experience is with movebale partions that are hung with hangers and braces from buildings with steel framing and composite metal deck. Sometimes, supplemental steel is required; and sometimes, it isn't.

RE: Seismic Design of Operable Walls

(OP)
I guess I should have separated the two parts to this question;

1.  How to handle the partition design from the manufacturer's point of view.  The partition panels slide on the top track and they can swing back & forth perpendicular to the track when stored and when not locked at the bottom.  These cases would be the wall designer's responsibilty and are what I'm wondering about.


2.  How to account for the partition in the design of the building's framing.  I think this would be the three cases that wanabeEIT refers to and would rightly be the EOR responsibility; and I agree with his comments.

Any other's have thoughts or experiance with this?

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources